Acceptability of a wearable vital sign detection system

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 1006-1010

  Tharion, William J ^a   Buller, Mark J ^a   Karis, Anthony J ^a   Mullen, Stephen P ^a  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PATIENT MONITORING; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

COMBAT TRAINING; HEALTH MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING SYSTEMS; PRONE POSITION; SKIN IRRITATION; VITAL SIGN;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 58149458663     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120705101702     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Healy, J. (2004). Challenges of ambulatory physiological monitoring. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 108:95-102.
2. Hoyt, R.W. and Friedl, K.E. (2004). Current status of field applications of physiological monitoring for the dismounted soldier. In: Monitoring Metabolic Status: Predicting Decrements in Physiological and Cognitive Performance (pp. 247-257). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
3. Hursh, S. R., Redmond, S.P., Johnson, M.L., Thorne, D.R., Belenky, G., Balkin, T.J. et al. (2004). Fatigue models for applied research in warfighting. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 75(3): A44-A53.
4. Knight, J.F. and Baber, C.A. (2005). Tool to assess the comfort of wearable computers. Human Factors, 47(1): 77-91.
5. Meinander, H. and Honkala, M. (2004). Potential applications of smart clothing in health care and personal protection. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 108:275-285.