Cotton injury and yield as affected by simulated drift of 2,4-D and dicamba

Weed Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 609-614

  Marple, Molly E ^a   Al Khatib, Kassim ^a   Peterson, Dallas E ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gossypium hirsutum; Herbicide injury; Low rates; Stage of growth

Indexed keywords

CROP DAMAGE; CROP YIELD; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWING SEASON; INJURY; NONTARGET ORGANISM; PESTICIDE APPLICATION;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 58149457996     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-07-095.1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Al-Khatib, K., D. Gealy, and C. Boerboom. 1994. Effect of droplet size and thifensulfuron concentration on phytotoxicity in pea. Weed Sci. 42:482-486.
2. Al-Khatib, K., R. Parker, and E. P. Fuerst. 1993. Wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) response to simulated herbicide drift. Weed Technol. 7:97-102.
3. Andersen, S. M., S. A. Clay, L. J. Wrage, and D. Matthees. 2004. Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron. J. 96:750-760.
4. Bhatti, M. A., K. Al-Khatib, A. S. Felsot, R. Parker, and S. Kadir. 1995. Effects of simulated chlorsulfuron drift on fruit yield and quality of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14:537-544.
5. Bhatti, M. A., K. Al-Khatib, and R. Parker. 1996. Wine grape (Vitis vinifera) response to repeated exposure of selected sulfonylurea herbicides and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 10:951-956.
6. Deeds, Z. A., K. Al-Khatib, D. E. Peterson, and P. W. Stahlman. 2006. Wheat response to simulated drift of glyphosate and imazamox applied at two growth stages. Weed Technol. 20:23-31.
7. Duncan, S. R., D. L. Fjell, D. E. Peterson, and G. W. Warmann. 1993. Cotton production in Kansas. Mahattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-1088.
8. Everitt, J. D., J. W. Keeling, and P. A. Dotray. 2005. Effects of 2,4-D timings and rates on cotton growth and yield. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 58, http:// lubbock.tamu.edu/weeds/pdf/swssabstract205.pdf. Accessed: November 21, 2006.
9. Fagliari, J. R., R. S. Oliveira, Jr., and J. Constantin. 2005. Impact of sublethal doses of 2,4-D, simulating drift, on tomato yield. J. Environ. Sci. Health B40:201-206.
10. Gilreath, J. P., C. A. Chase, and S. J. Locascio. 2001. Crop injury from sublethal rates of herbicide. III. Pepper. HortSci. 36:677-681.
11. Hamilton, K. C. and H. F. Arle. 1979. Response of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to dicamba. Weed Sci. 27:604-607.
12. Hurst, H. R. 1986. Response of cotton to selected herbicides applied to simulate drift. Mississippi Agriculture Experiment Station Bulletin B-946. Delta Branch Experiment Station, MS.
13. Hutchins, R. 1953. 2,4-D herbicides pose threat to cotton and other susceptible crops. Science 118:782-783.
14. Jacoby, P. W., C. H. Meadors, and L. E. Clark. 1990. Effects of triclopyr, clopyralid, and picloram on growth and production of cotton. J. Prod. Agric. 3:297-301.
15. Kelley, K. B., L. M. Wax, A. G. Hager, and D. E. Riechers. 2005. Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 53:101-112.
16. Kurtz, M. E. and J. E. Street. 2003. Response of rice (Oryza sativa) to glyphosate applied to simulate drift. Weed Technol. 17:234-238.
17. Lanini, W. T. 2000. Simulated drift of herbicides on grapes, tomatoes, cotton, and sunflower. Proc. Calif. Weed Conf. 52:107-110.
18. Miller, D. K., R. G. Downer, B. R. Leonard, E. M. Holman, and S. T. Kelly. 2004. Response of nonglyphosate-resistant cotton to reduced rates of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 52:178-182.
19. NCDC. 2007. US climate reference network. Station 1047, http://www.ncdc. noaa.gov/crn/hourly?station-id=1047. Accessed: March 08, 2007.
20. Orfanedes, M. S., L. M. Wax, and R. A. Liebl. 1993. Absence of a role for absorption, translocation, and metabolism in differential sensitivity of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to two pyridine herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:1-6.
21. Rawson, J. E. and G. N. Schrodter. 1981. Preliminary study of the effects of simulated herbicide drift on cotton toxicity, residues. Proc. Aust. Weed Conf. 6:137-138.
22. Regehr, D. L., D. E. Peterson, W. H. Fick, P. W. Stahlman, and R. E. Wolf. 2006. Chemical weed control for field crops, pastures, rangeland, and noncropland. Report of Progress SRP 958. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
23. Regier, C., R. E. Dilbeck, D. J. Undersander, and J. E. Quisenberry. 1986. Cotton resistance to 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid spray drift. Crop Sci. 26:376-377.
24. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 2002. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
25. Sciumbato, A. S., J. M. Chandler, S. A. Senseman, R. W. Bovey, and K. L. Smith. 2004. Determining exposure to auxin-like herbicides. I. Quantifying injury to cotton and soybean. Weed Technol. 18:1125-1134.
26. Snipes, C. E., J. E. Street, and T. C. Mueller. 1991. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated triclopyr drift. Weed Technol. 5:493-498.
27. Snipes, C. E., J. E. Street, and T. C. Mueller. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to simulated quinclorac drift. Weed Sci. 40:106-109.
28. Staten, G. 1946. Contamination of cotton fields by 2,4-D or hormone type weed sprays. Agron. J. 38:536-544.
29. Thomas, W. E., I. C. Burke, B. L. Robinson, W. A. Pline-Srnic', K. L. Edmisten, R. Wells, and J. W. Wilcut. 2005. Yield and physiological response of nontransgenic cotton to simulated glyphosate drift. Weed Technol. 19:35-42.
30. [USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Agricultural Marketing Service. Cotton Program. http://ams.usda.gov/cotton/pdf%20forms/HVIguidejuly- 2001.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2006.
31. Wall, D. A. 1997. Effect of crop growth stage on tolerance to low doses of thifensulfuron:tribenuron. Weed Sci. 45:538-545.
32. Wanamarta, G. and D. Penner. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215-231.