Revision cochlear implantation surgery in adults: Indications and results

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 639-648

  Rivas, Alejandro ^a   Marlowe, Andrea L ^a   Chinnici, Jill E ^a   Niparko, John K ^a   Francis, Howard W ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Device defect; Electrode extrusion; Facial stimulation; Hard failure; Infection; Revision surgery; Soft failure; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FACIAL NERVE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INFECTION; MALE; NERVE STIMULATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TINNITUS; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADOLESCENT; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREVALENCE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREVALENCE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58149402770     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817e5d31     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. House W, Edgerton B. A multiple-electrode cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:104-16.
2. Hochmair-Desoyer I, Burian K. Reimplantation of a molded scala tympani electrode: impact on psychophysical and speech discrimination abilities. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1985;94:65-70.
3. Balkany T, Hodges A, Gomez-Marin O, et al. Cochlear reimplan-tation. Laryngoscope 1999;109:351-5.
4. Parisier S, Chute P, Popp A, Suh G. Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children. Laryngoscope 2001;111:26-32.
5. Alexiades G, Roland JJ, Fishman A, Shapiro W, Waltzman S, Cohen N. Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1608-13.
6. Buchman C, Higgins C, Cullen R, Pillsbury H. Revision cochlear implant surgery in adult patients with suspected device malfunction. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:504-10.
7. Gantz B, Lowder M, McCabe B. Audiologic results following reimplantation of cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;142:12-6.
8. Miyamoto R, Svirsky M, WA M, Kirk K, Schulte J. Cochlear implant reimplantation. Am J Otol 1997;18:S60-1.
9. Henson A, Slattery WI, Luxford W, Mills D. Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Otol 1999;20:56-64.
10. Shepherd R, Clark G, Xu S-A, Pyman B. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque. Am J Otol 1995;16:186-99.
11. Amdur RJ, Biddle C. Institutional review board approval and publication of human research results. Special Communication. JAMA 1997;277:909-14.
12. Peterson G, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962;27:62-70.
13. Tillman T, Carhart R. An Expanded Test for Speech Discrimination Utilizing CNC Monosyllabic Words. Northwestern University Test No. 6. Brooks Air Force Base, TX: USAF School of Aerospace Medicine; 1966. Technical Report SAM-TR-66-55.
14. Davis H, Silverman SR. Hearing and Deafness. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1978.
15. Nilsson M, Soli S, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085-99.
16. Balkany T, Hodges A, Buchman C, et al. Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:815-8.
17. Lassig A, Zwolan T, Telian S. Cochlear implant failures and revision. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:624-34.
18. Cote M, Ferron P, Bergeron F, Bussiere R. Cochlear reimplanta-tion: causes of failure, outcomes and audiologic performance. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1225-35.
19. Battmer R-D, O'Donoghue G, Lenarz T. A multicenter study of device failure in European cochlear implant centers. Ear Hear 2007;28:95S-9S.
20. Maurer J, Marangos N, Ziegler E. Reliability of cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:746-50.
21. Dutt S, Ray J, Hadjihannas E, Cooper H, Donaldson I, Proops D. Medical and surgical complications of the second 100 adult cochlear implant patients in Birmingham. J Laryngol Otol 2005; 119:759-64.
22. Parisier S, Chute P, Popp A. Cochlear implant mechanical failures. Am J Otol 1996;17:730-4.
23. Roland JJ, Huang T, Cohen N. Revision cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2006;39:833-9.
24. Jackler R, Leake P, McKerrow W. Cochlear implant revision: effects of reimplantation on the cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:813-20.
25. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurotol 2004;9:163-72.
26. Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB. Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 2005; 115:672-7.
27. Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R. Quality control after insertion of the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 2007;28:75S-9S.
28. Skinner M, Holden T, Whiting B, et al. In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:1-24.
29. Leung J, Wang N-Y, Yeagle J, et al. Predictive models for cochlear implantation in the elderly. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:1049-54.
30. Goŕdon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons P. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:1276-85.