Ethical studies, ethical publication

Occupational Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-3

  Rawbone, Roger ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DATA ANALYSIS; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED KINGDOM; ETHICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 58149397995     PISSN: 09627480     EISSN: 14718405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqn138     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
2. Smith R. The Trouble with Medical Journals. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2007.
3. The Committee on Publication Ethics at http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/.
4. Lemaire F. Editorial: Do all types of human research need ethics committee approval? Am J Crit Care Med 2006;174: 363-364.
5. Elliott L, Hunter D. The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees. J Med Ethics 2008;34:489-494.
6. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees. Building on improvement: implementing the recommendations of the report of the ad hoc group on the operation of NHS research ethics committees. August 2006.
7. 'Publish and be damned'. Duke of Wellington 1769-1852: Attributed. Replying to courtesan Harriette Wilson's blackmail threat when she threatened to publish her memoirs and his letters.