Dominance among alternatives in random utility models

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 170-179

  Cascetta, Ennio ^a   Papola, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Choice set modelling; Destination choice; Dominance

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; TRANSPORTATION;

DESTINATION CHOICE; DISCRETE CHOICE; DOMINANCE; RANDOM UTILITY MODEL; RANDOM UTILITY THEORY; SPATIAL POSITIONS; SPATIAL VARIABLES; TRANSPORT DEMAND;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MODELING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

EID: 58149396661     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allenby G., and Ginter J. The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (1995) 67-80
2. Andrews R., and Srinivasan T.C. Studying consideration effects in empirical choice models using scanner panel data. Journal of Marketing Research 32 (1995) 30-41
3. Basar G., and Bhat C. A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice. An application to the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research 38 (2004) 889-904
4. Ben Akiva M., and Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand (1985), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
5. Ben-Akiva M., and Bierlaire M. Discrete choice models and their applications to short-term travel decisions. Handbook of Transportation Science 26 (1999) 5-34
6. Ben-Akiva M., and Boccarà B. Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 (1995) 9-24
7. Block H.D., and Marschak J. Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. In: Olkin I., Ghurye S., Hoeffding W., Madow W., and Mann H. (Eds). Contributions to Probability and Statistics (1960), Stanford University Press 97-132
8. Cantillo V., and Ortúzar J.d.D. A semi-compensatory discrete choice model with explicit attribute thresholds of perception. Transportation Research 39 (2004) 641-657
9. Cantillo V., Heydecker B., and Ortuzar J.d.D. A discrete choice model incorporating thresholds for perception in attribute values. Transportation Research Part B 40 (2006) 807-825
10. Cascetta E. Transportation systems engineering: theory and methods (2001), Kluwer
11. Cascetta E., and Papola A. Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand. Transportation Research Part C 9/4 (2001) 249-263
12. Cascetta E., Nuzzolo A., Russo F., and Vitetta A. A new route choice logit model overcoming IIA problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Lesort J.B. (Ed). Proceedings of the 13th international symposium on transportation and traffic theory (1996), Pergamon, Lyon
13. Chankong V., and Haimes Y.Y. Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology (1983), Elsevier-North-Holland, New York
14. Chiang J., Siddhartha C., and Chakravarthi N. Markov chain Monte Carlo and model of consideration set and parameter heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1999) 223-248
15. Daly A. Estimating choice models containing attraction variables. Transportation Research Part B 16 (1982) 5-15
16. Daly, A., Zachary, S., 1976. Improved multiple choice models. In: Proceedings of the 4th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, PTRC, London.
17. Elrod T., Johnson R., and White J. A new integrated model of noncompensatory and compensatory decision strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95 (2005) 1-19
18. Gaudry M., and Dagenais M. The dogit model. Transportation Research Part B 13 (1979) 105-111
19. Gensch D.H. A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Science 6 (1987) 223-231
20. Gilbride T., and Allenby G. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Science 23 (2004) 391-406
21. Haimes Y.Y., and Chankong V. Decision Making with Multiple Objectives (1985), Springer, Verlag, Berlin
22. Hauser J.R., and Gaskin S. Application of the "defender" consumer model. Marketing Science 3 (1984) 327-351
23. Horowitz J.L., and Louviere J.J. What is the role of consideration sets in choice modeling?. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12 1 (1995) 39-54
24. Improta, A.A., Papola, A., 2000. Un modello di distribuzione con simulazione implicita dell'insieme di scelta. In: Proceedings of the II Conference "Metodi e tecnologie dell'ingegneria dei trasporti", Franco Angeli.
25. Manski C. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision 8 (1977) 229-254
26. Manski C., and McFadden D. Alternative Estimators and Sample Designs for Discrete Choice Analysis. Department of Economics (1977), University of California, Berkeley, CA
27. McFadden D. Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A., et al. (Ed). Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (1978), North Holland, Amsterdam
28. McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In: Manski C., and McFadden D. (Eds). Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981), MIT Press, Cambridge Mass 198-272
29. Meyer R. A behavioral theory of choice set formation under informational constraints. Transportation Research Record 750 (1980) 6-12
30. Morikawa, T., 1995. A hybrid probabilistic choice set model with compensatory and non-compensatory choice rules. In: Proceedings 7th World Conference on Transport Research. Travel Behaviour, vol. 1. Pergamon, Oxford.
31. Ratchford B.T. The value of information for selected appliances. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (1980) 14-25
32. Richards M., and Ben-Akiva M. A Disaggregate Travel Demand Model (1975), D.C. Heath, Lexington, Mass
33. Roberts J., and Lattin J. Developing and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research 28 (1991) 429-440
34. Schneider M. Gravity models and trip distribution theory. Papers of Regional Science Association 5 (1959) 47-56
35. Shugan S.M. The cost of thinking. Journal of Consumer Research 7 (1980) 99-111
36. Silk A.J., and Urban G.L. Pre-test market evaluation of new packaged goods: a model and measurement methodology. Journal of Marketing Research 15 (1978) 171-191
37. Stouffer S.A. Intervening opportunities and competing migrants. Journal of Regional Science 2 (1960) 1-26
38. Swait, J., 1984. Probabilistic choice set formation in transportation demand models. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
39. Swait J. Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 643-666
40. Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transportation Research Part B 35 (2001) 903-928
41. Swait J., and Ben-Akiva M. Incorporating random constraints in discrete choice models of choice set generation. Transportation Research Part B 21 (1987) 91-102
42. Swait J., and Ben-Akiva M. Empirical test of a constrained choice discrete model: mode choice in São Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research Part B 21 (1987) 103-115 PLC
43. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychological Review 79 (1972) 281-299
44. Williams H.C.W.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning 9 (1977) 285-344
45. Williams H., and Ortuzar J. Behavioral theories of dispersion and the misspecification of travel demand models. Transportation Research Part B 16 (1982) 167-219
46. Zhang, J., Fujiwara, A., Kusakabe, T., 2005. A new discrete choice model with endogenous generation of choice set based on the principle of relative utility maximization. In: Proceeding of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.