The Creative Task Creator: A tool for the generation of customized, Web-based creativity tasks

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1129-1133

  Pretz, Jean E ^a   Link, John A ^a  

^a ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CREATIVITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

CREATIVENESS; HUMANS; INTERNET; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 58149378470     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1129     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Ames, S. L., Gallaher, P. E., Sun, P., Pearce, S., Zogg, J. B., Houska, B. R., et al. (2005). A Web-based program for coding open-ended response protocols. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 470-479.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
4. Fraley, R. C. (2007). Using the Internet for personality research: What can be done, how to do it, and some concerns. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 130-148). New York: Guilford.
5. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
6. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Narrative and paradigmatic thinking styles in creative writing and journalism students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 201-220.
8. Landers, C., & Pretz, J. E. (2008). Development of domain-general and domain-specific creativity among college students. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Niu, W., Zhang, J. X., & Yang, Y. (2007). Deductive reasoning and creativity: A cross-cultural study. Psychological Reports, 100, 509-519.
10. Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243-256.
12. Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311-319.
13. Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, & the Arts, 2, 68-85.
14. Simonton, D. K. (1999a). Creativity from a historiometric perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 116-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Simonton, D. K. (1999b). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4, 425-451.
16. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
17. Torrance, E. P. (1998). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Normstechnical manual: Figural (streamlined) forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.