Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 114-139

  Carlson, Katy ^a   Dickey, Michael Walsh ^b   Frazier, Lyn ^c   Clifton, Charles ^c  

^a MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Ellipsis; Information structure; Prosody; Sentence processing; Sluicing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE TESTS; MALE; PHONETICS; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 58149352834     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210701880171     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748-765.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K. Y., Gamham, A., & Henstra, J.-A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 459-484.
3. Atlas, J. D., & Levinson, S. C. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 1-61). New York: Academic.
4. Bartels, C., & Kingston, J. (1996). Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus. In M. W. Dickey & S. Tunstall (Eds.), UMOP 19: Linguistics in the laboratory (pp. 1-26). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
5. Beckman, M., & Elam, G. A. (1997). Guidelines for ToBI transcription. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
6. Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2006). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In S.-A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodictypology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9-54). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology yearbook, 3, 255-309.
8. Birch, S., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension. Language and Speech, 38, 365-391.
9. Birch, S., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2002). Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 571-588.
10. Birch, S. L., & Garnsey, S. (1995). The effect of focus on memory for words in sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 232-267.
11. Birch, S., & Rayner, K. (1997). Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25, 653-660.
12. Birner, B., & Ward, G. (1998). Information status and non-canonical word order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Bock, K., & Mazelia, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11, 64-76.
14. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2003). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.1.1) [Computer software]. Available from www.praat.org
15. Carlson, K. (2001). The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping sentences. Language and Speech, 44, 1-26.
16. Carlson, K. (2002). Parallelism and prosody in the processing of ellipsis sentences. New York: Routledge.
17. Carlson, K., Dickey, M. W., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Structural economy in the processing and representation of gapping sentences. Syntax, 8, 208-228.
18. Chung, S., Ladusaw, W., & McCloskey, J. (1995). Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics, 3, 239-282.
19. Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239-297.
20. Clifton, C., Jr., Bock, J., &Rado,J. (2000). Effects of the focus particle only and intrinsic contrast on the comprehension of reduced relative clauses. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, &J. Pynter (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21. Cohan, J. (2000). The realization and function of focus in spoken English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
22. Cowles, H. W., & Garnham, A. (2005). Antecedent focus and conceptual distance effects in category noun-phrase anaphora. Language and CognitiveProcesses, 20, 725 -750.
23. Cowles, H. W., Kluender, R, Kutas, M., &Polinsky, M. (2007). Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions. Brain and Language, 102, 228-242.
24. Cutler, A, & Focfor, J, A, (1979). Semantic focus and sentence comprehension. Cognition, 7, 49-59.
25. Dainora, A. (2002). Does international meaning come from tones or tunes? Evidence against a compositional approach. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference (pp. 235 -238). Aixen-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
26. E-Prime (Version 1.0). (2002). [Computer software], Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
27. Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Parsing with focus particles in context: Evidence from eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 473-495.
28. Foraker, S., &McElree, B. (2007). The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations. Journal of 'Memory and Language, 56, 357-383.
29. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1998). Comprehension of sluiced sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 499-520.
30. Glanzer, M., & Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 5, 351-360.
31. Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1411-1423.
32. Grosz, B. J. Joshi, A. K., &Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: a framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203-226.
33. Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521.
34. Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Jaeger, J. J. (2005, January). Universals vs. language-specific factors in speech production planning: The effect of prosody and information structure. Paper presentedat the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Oakland, CA.
36. Johnson, S. M., Clifton, C., Jr., Breen, M., & Morris, J. (2003, April). ERP investigation of prosodic and semantic focus. Poster presented at Cognitive Neuroscience, New York City.
37. Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, andfocus. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38. Kiss, K. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74, 245-273.
39. Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2001). On the alleged existence of contrastive accents. Speech Communication, 34, 391-405.
40. Kratzer, A. (2004). Interpreting focus: Presupposed or expressive meanings? Theoretical Linguistics, 30, 123-136.
41. Krifka, M. (1992). A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
42. Ladd, D. R. (1990). Metrical representation of pitch register. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology P. Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 35-57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational phonology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Ladd, D. R., & Schepman, A. (2003). "Sagging transitions" between high pitch accents in English: Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 81-112.
45. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46. Lee, Y., Lee, H., & Gordon, P. C. (2007). Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Cognition, 104, 495-534.
47. Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Clayes, E. L. (2002). The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 225-240.
48. Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283-334.
50. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., Filik, R., Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2007). Focus identification during sentence comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1423-1145.
51. Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic processing of "short" reduced relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 717-737.
52. Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
53. Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonation in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 271-311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Rochemont, M. S. (1986). Focus in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Romero, M. (1998). Sluicing and focusing a wh-phrase. In E. Benedicto, M. Romero, & S. Tomioka (Eds.), UMOP 21: Proceedings of the Workshop on Focus (pp. 191-208). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
56. Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
57. Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
58. Sag, I. (1980). Deletion and logical form. New York: Garland Publishing.
59. Schafer, A., Carlson, K., Clifton, C, Jr., & Frazier, L. (2000). Focus and the interpretation of pitch accents: Disambiguating embedded questions. Language and Speech, 43, 75-106.
60. Schafer, A., Carter, J., Clifton, C, Jr., & Frazier, L. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 135-163.
61. Schwarzschild, R. (1999). GIVENness, AVOIDF and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics, 7, 141-177.
62. Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Invoking discourse-based contrast sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 341-370.
63. Selkirk, E. O. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64. Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), Handbook of phonological theory (pp. 550-569). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
65. Selkirk, E. O. (2000). The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In G. Bruce & M. Home (Eds.), Prosody, theory and experiment: Studies presented to Gosia Bruce. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
66. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., & Ross, K. (1994). Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 357-388.
67. Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., et al. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. Paper presented at the 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Banff, Canada.
68. Stolterfoht, B. (2005). Processing word order variations and ellipses: The interplay of syntax and information structure during sentence comprehension. Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences.
69. Stolterfoht, B., Friederici, A. D., Alter, K., &Steube, A. (2007). Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects. Cognition, 104, 565-590.
70. Sturt, P., Sanford, A, Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 882-888.
71. Vallduvi, E. (1992). The information component. New York: Garland Press.
72. Vallduvi, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34, 459-519.
73. Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2005). Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English. Language andCognitive Processes, 20, 751-767.
74. Welby, P. (2003). Effects of pitch accent position, type, and status on focus projection. Language and Speech, 46, 53-81.