Formalizing internationalization in the eclectic paradigm

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 58-70

  Buckley, Peter J ^a   Hashai, Niron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Eclectic paradigm; Entry mode; Internationalization; Multinational enterprise

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149350264     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400421     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62(5): 775-795.
2. Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 155-165.
3. Brainard, S. L. 1997. An empirical assessment of the proximity- concentration tradeoff between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87(4): 520-544.
4. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan.
5. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1998. Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 539-562.
6. Cantwell, J. 1995. The globalisation of technology: What remains of the product cycle model? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1): 155-174.
7. Cantwell, J., & Narula, R. 2001. The eclectic paradigm in the global economy. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 155-172.
8. Carr, D., Markusen, J. R., & Maskus, K. E. 2001. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. American Economic Review, 91(3): 693-708.
9. Casson, M. 1985. Multinationals and intermediate product trade. In P. J. Buckley & M. Casson (Eds), The economic theory of the multinational enterprise: 144-171. London: Macmillan.
10. Casson, M. 2000. The economics of international business: A new research agenda. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11. Dunning, J. H. 1977. Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P.-O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkman (Eds), The international allocation of economic activity: 395-418. London: Macmillan.
12. Dunning, J. H. 1981. FDI and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen & Unwin.
13. Dunning, J. H. 1988. The eclectic paradigm of FDI: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1-31.
14. Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 45-66.
16. Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. 1995. The R&D activities of foreign firms in the United States. International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(1-2): 39-73.
17. Eden, L. 2003. A critical reflection and some conclusions on OLI. In J. Cantwell & R. Narula (Eds), International business and the eclectic paradigm: 277-297. London: Routledge.
18. Ethier, W. J. 1986. The multinational firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4): 805-833.
19. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. 2002. Integration vs outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1): 85-120.
20. Heckscher, E. 1949. The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income. In H. S. Ellis & L. A. Metzler (Eds), Readings in international trade: 43-69. Philadelphia: The Blakiston Co.
21. Helpman, E. 1984. A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. Journal of Political Economy, 92(3): 451-471.
22. Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. 1985. Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Henisz, W. J. 2005. The institutional environment for international business. In P. J. Buckley (Ed.), What is international business?: 85-109. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Hennart, J.-F. 1982. A theory of multinational enterprise. Ann Arbor, Ml: University of Michigan Press.
25. Hennart, J.-F. 1993. Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of "market" and "hierarchy". Organization Science, 4(4): 529-547.
26. Hirsch, S. 1976. An international trade and investment theory of the firm. Oxford Economic Papers, 28(2): 258-270.
27. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Horstman, I. J., & Markusen, J. R. 1987. Strategic investments and the development of multinationals. International Economic Review, 28(1): 109-121.
29. Hymer, S. H. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment Unpublished 1960 Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
30. Kogut, B., & Chang, S.-J. 1991. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3): 401-41 3.
31. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-423.
32. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625-645.
33. Lewin, A. Y., & Peeters, C. 2006. Offshoring work: Business hype or the onset of fundamental transformation? Long Range Planning, 39(3): 221-239.
34. Under, S. B. 1961. An essay on trade and transformation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Markusen, J. R. 1984. Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 16(3-4): 205-226.
36. Markusen, J. R. 1998. Multinational firms, location and trade. The World Economy, 21(6): 733-755.
37. Markusen, J. R. 2001. International trade theory and international business. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds), The Oxford handbook of international business: 69-87. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Markusen, J. R., & Venables, A. J. 1998. Multinational firms and the new trade theory. Journal of International Economics, 46(2): 183-203.
39. Markusen, J. R., & Venables, A. J. 2000. The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multinational trade. Journal of International Economics, 52(2): 209-234.
40. Martin, X., & Salomon, R. 2003. Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4): 356-373.
41. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1988. Economic theories of the firm: Past, present, and future. Canadian Journal of Economics, 21 (3): 444-458.
42. Ohlin, B. 1933. Interregional and international trade. Boston: Harvard University Press.
43. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. 1985. Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3): 435-454.
44. Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
45. Rugman, A. M. 1986. New theories of the multinational enterprise: An assessment of internalization theory. Bulletin of Economic Research, 38(2): 101-119.
46. Shenkar, O. 2001. Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3): 519-536.
47. Solow, R. 1957. Technical progress and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312-320.
48. Teece, D. 1981. The multinational enterprise: Market failure and market power consideration. Sloan Management Review, 22(3): 3-17.
49. UNCTAD. 2005. World investment report. Geneva: United Nations.
50. Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust applications. New York: Free Press.
51. Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
52. Yang, X. 1994. Endogenous vs exogenous comparative advantages and economies of specialization vs economies of scale. Journal of Economics, 60(1): 29-54.
53. Yang, X. 2001. Economics: New classical versus neoclassical analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Yang, X., & Ng, Y. K. 1995. Theory of the firm and structure of residual rights, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 26(1): 107-128.
55. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341-363.