The rise and fall of third-party high-speed access

Information Economics and Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 21-33

  Rosston, Gregory L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Internet; Telecommunications; Vertical integration

Indexed keywords

CABLES; COMPETITION; INTEGRATED CONTROL; INTEGRATION; INTERNET; SPEED; STRESS INTENSITY FACTORS; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS; TELEPHONE SYSTEMS;

CABLE COMPANIES; INTEGRATED APPROACHES; INTERNET SERVICES; INTERNET USAGES; TELEPHONE COMPANIES; TIME PERIODS; VERTICAL INTEGRATION;

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

INDUSTRIAL COMPETITION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTERNET; TELECOMMUNICATION; VERTICAL INTEGRATION;

EID: 58149347131     PISSN: 01676245     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Akamai Technologies Inc., 1999. Prospectus, 10/28/99.
2. At Home, 1999. Form S-4, 4/27/1999.
3. Baumol, W., Sidak, J., 1994. Toward competition in local telephony.
4. Bazelon, C., Hazlett, T., 2005. Regulated unbundling of telecommunications networks: a stepping stone to facilities-based competition? Presented at the 2005 TPRC.
5. Bear Stearns & Co. Inc., 2001. AOL TimeWarner (AOL-$52.56) - Attractive - You've Got Guidance, 2/1/2001.
6. Blumenthal M., and Clark D. Rethinking the design of the Internet: the end to end arguments vs. the brave new world. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology 1 1 (2001) 70-109
7. Bresnahan T., and Greenstein S. Technological competition and the structure of the computer industry. Journal of Industrial Economics XLVII 1 (1999)
8. Brock G. The Second Information Revolution (2003), Harvard University Press
9. Cable Datacom News, 1998. Turnkey ISPs in Real Estate Battle, 9/98.
10. Cannon R. The legacy of the federal communications commission's computer inquiries. Federal Communications Law Journal 55 2 (2003) 167-206
11. Chattanooga Times, 2002. Comcast Set to Use Its Own High-Speed Internet Network in Chattanooga, Tenn., 1/15/02.
12. Clark D., Lehr B., Bauer S., Faratin P., Sami R., and Wroclawski J. Overlay networks and the future of the internet. Communications and Strategies 63 3 (2006) 1-21
13. Coffman K.G., and Odlyzko A.M. Growth of the Internet. In: Kaminow I.P., and Li T. (Eds). Optical Fiber Telecommunications IV B: Systems and Impairments (2002), Academic Press 17-56
14. Coffman K.G., and Odlyzko A.M. Internet growth: is there a Moore's law for data traffic?. In: Abello J., Pardalos P.M., and Resende M.G.C. (Eds). Handbook of Massive Data Sets (2002), Kluwer 47-93
15. Covad, 1998. S-1, September 21, 1998.
16. Cox Communications, 2002. Investor Center, News Release, 1/7/02.
17. Credit Suisse First Boston, Equity Research, Excite, 1/25/99.
18. Curran, J., 1997. BBN Planet, FCC Bandwidth Forum. Washington DC, January 23rd, 1997, Written Presentation.
19. Downes T., and Greenstein S. Universal access and local commercial internet markets. Research Policy 31 (2002) 1035-1052
20. Federal Communications Commission, 1995, 1997, 1998, 1998b. Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition in the Market for the Delivery of Video Programming.
21. Federal Communications Commission, 2005. Statistics of Common Carriers, rel. Nov 2005.
22. Federal Communications Commission, 2007. High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2006, rel. Oct 2007.
23. Kende, M., 2000. The Digital Handshake: Connecting Internet Backbones. OPP Working Paper No. 32, 2000, p. 44.
24. Lemley M., and Lessig L. The end of end-to-end: preserving the architecture of the internet in the broadband era. UCLA Law Review 48 (2001) 925-972
25. Marples, G., 2004. The History of DSL Internet Access. Speedguide.net.
26. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, 2001. Internet Direct Marketing and Advertising Services, 2/22/01.
27. National Telecommunications Information Agency, 2004. A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Era.
28. Noam E. Fundamental instability: why telecom is becoming a cyclical and oligopolistic industry. Information, Economics and Policy 18 3 (2006) 272-284
29. Noll, R., Owen, B., 1994. The anticompetitive use of regulation: United States v AT&T. In: Kwoka, J.E. White, L.J. (Eds.), The Antiturst Revolution, second ed., pp. 328-375.
30. Noll R., and Rosston G. The economics of the Supreme Court's decision on forward looking costs. Review of Network Economics 1 2 (2002)
31. Owen B., and Rosston G. Local broadband access: primum non nocere or primium processi: a property rights approach. In: Lenard T., and May R. (Eds). Net Neutrality or Net Neutering: Should Broadband Internet Services be Regulated (2006), Springer, New York
32. Rey, P., Tirole, J., 2003. A Primer on Foreclosure. In: Armstrong, Porter (Eds.), Forthcoming Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. III.
33. Rhythms Net Connections, 1998. Form S-4, 7/17/98.
34. Rubinfeld D., and Singer H. Vertical foreclosure in broadband access?. Journal of Industrial Economics 49 3 (2001) 299-318
35. Sanford Bernstein & Co., Inc., McKinsey & Co, Inc., 2000. Broadband!
36. Telegeography, Bandwidth Pricing Database.
37. Waterman D., and Weiss A. Vertical Integration in Cable Television (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Werbach K. A layered model for internet policy. Journal of Telecommunications and High-Tech Law 37 (2002) 58-64