CO2 fluxes near a forest edge: A numerical study

Ecological Applications

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1454-1469

  Sogachev, Andrey ^a,b   Leclerc, Monique Y ^c   Zhang, Gengsheng ^c   Rannik, Üllar ^a   Vesala, Timo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Canopy turbulence; Flux measurements; Forest edge; Surface heterogeneities; Two equation model

Indexed keywords

ADVECTION; ATMOSPHERE-BIOSPHERE INTERACTION; BOUNDARY LAYER; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; FLUX MEASUREMENT; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST EDGE; LEAF AREA; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; SPATIAL VARIATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AIR; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; METABOLISM; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREE;

AIR MOVEMENTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOSYSTEM; MODELS, THEORETICAL; TREES;

EID: 58149337455     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-1119.1     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. 2 storage and advection conditions at night at different Carboeuroflux sites. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 116:63-94.
2. 2 advection in a sloping forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 108:397-417.
3. Belcher, S. E., N. Jerram, and J. C. R. Hunt. 2003. Adjustment of a turbulent boundary layer to a canopy of roughness elements. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 488:369-398.
4. Campbell, G. S., and J. M. Norman. 1998. An introduction to environmental biophysics. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
5. Corrsin, S. 1974. Limitations of gradient transport models in random walks and turbulence. Advances in Geophysics 18A: 25-60.
6. Denmead, O. T., and E. F. Bradley. 1985. Flux-gradient relationships in a forest canopy. Pages 421-442 in B, A. Hutchison and B. B. Hicks, editors. The forest-atmosphere interaction. Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Finnigan, J. J. 1999. A comment on the paper by Lee (1998): on micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 97: 55-64.
8. Finnigan. J. J. 2000. Turbulence in plant canopies. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32:519-571.
9. Finnigan, J. J., and S. E. Belcher. 2004. Flow over a hill covered with a plant canopy. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 130:1-29.
10. Flesch, T. K., and J. D. Wilson. 1999. Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocks: I. Measured winds in experimental cutblocks. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 93:229-242.
11. Foudhil, H., Y. Brunet, and J.-P. Caltagirone. 2005. A fine-scale κ-ε model for atmospheric flow over heterogeneous landscapes. Environmental Fluid Mechanics 5:247-265.
12. Gash, J. H. 1986. Observations of turbulence downwind of a forest-heath interface. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 36:227-237,
13. Gross, G. 1993. Numerical simulation of canopy flows. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
14. Irvine, M. R., B. A. Gardiner, and M. K. Hill. 1997. The evolution of turbulence across a forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 84:467-496.
15. Kantha, L. H. 2004. The length scale equation in turbulence models. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 7:1-15,
16. Katul, G. G., J. J. Finnigan, D. Poggi, R. Leuning, and S. E. Belcher. 2006. The influence of hilly terrain on canopy-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 118:189-216.
17. Katul, G. G., L. Mahrt, D. Poggi, and C. Sanz. 2004. One- and two-equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 113:81-109.
18. 2 sources, sinks and fluxes in uniform loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand, Journal of Geophysical Research 102:9309-9321.
19. Klaassen, W. 1992. Average fluxes from heterogeneous vegetated regions. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 58:329-354.
20. Klaassen, W., and A. Sogachev. 2006. Flux footprint simulation downwind of a forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 121:459-473.
21. Klaassen, W., P. B. van Breugel, E. J. Moors, and J. P. Nieveen. 2002. Increased heat fluxes near a forest edge. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 72:231-243.
22. Körner, C. 1994. Leaf diffusive conductance in the major vegetation types of the globe. Pages 463-188 in E, D, Schulze, editor. Canopy transport processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
23. Kruijt, B. 1994. Turbulence over forest downwind of an edge. Dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
24. Krzikalla, F. 2005. Numerical investigation of the interaction between wind and forest under heterogeneous conditions. Thesis. University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
25. Leclerc, M. Y., and G. W. Thurtell. 1990. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes using a Markovian analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 52:247-258.
26. Lee, X. 2000. Air motion within and above forest vegetation in non-ideal conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 135: 3-18.
27. Leuning, R., O. T. Denmead, A. Miyata, and J. Kim. 2000. Source-sink distributions of heat, water vapour, carbon dioxide and methane in rice canopies estimated using Lagrangian dispersion analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 104:233-249.
28. Li, Z, J., J. D. Lin, and D. R. Miller, 1990. Air flow over and through a forest edge: a steady-state numerical simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 51:179-197.
29. Lien, F. S, E. Yee, and J. D. Wilson. 2005, Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array. Part II: a mathematical foundation for a distributed drag force approach. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 114:245-285.
30. Markkanen, T., Ü. Rannik, B. Markolla, A. Cescatti, and T. Vesala. 2003. Footprints and fetches for fluxes over forest canopies with varying structure and density. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 106:437-459,
31. Meixner, F. X., and W. Eugster. 1999. Effects of landscape pattern and topography on emissions and transport. Pages 147-175 in J. D. Tcnhuncn and P. Kabat, editors. Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
32. Meroney, R. N. 1970. Wind tunnel studies of air flow and gaseous plume diffusion in the leading edge and downstream regions of a model forest. Atmospheric Environment 4:597-614.
33. Meyers, T., and K. T. Paw U. 1986. Testing of a higher-order closure model for modeling airflow within and above plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 37:297-311.
34. Morse, A. P., B. a'. Gardiner, and B. J. Marshall, 2002. Mechanisms controlling turbulence development across a forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 103:227-251.
35. Park, Y.-S., and K, T. Paw U. 2006. Flow simulation of turbulent and mean advective velocity and scalar fields across a canopy edge. Preprints of 17th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence and 27th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. San Diego, California, USA.
36. Patankar, S. V. 1980. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, New York, USA.
37. Pielke, R. 2002. Mesoscale meteorological modelling. Second edition. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
38. Pinard, J.-P., and J. D. Wilson. 2001. First- and second-order closure models for wind in a plant canopy. Journal of Applied Meteorology 40:1762-1768.
39. Rannik, Ü., M. Aubinet, O. Kurbanmuradov, K. Sabelfeld, T. Markkanen, and T. Vesala. 2000. Footprint analysis for measurements over a heterogeneous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 97:137-166,
40. Raupach, M. R. 1989. Applying Lagrangian fluid mechanics to infer scalar source distributions from concentration profiles in plant canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 47: 85-108.
41. Raupach, M. R., D. D. Baldocchi. H.-J. Bolle, L. Dümenil, W. Eugster, F. X. Meixner, J. A. Olejnik, R. A. Pielke, Sr., J. D. Tenhunen, and R. Valentini. 1999. How is the atmospheric coupling of land surfaces affected by topography, complexity. in landscape patterning, and the vegetation mosaic? Pages 177-196 in J. D. Tcnhuncn and P. Kabat, editors. Integrating hydrology, ecosystem dynamics, and biogeochemistry in complex landscapes. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
42. Raupach, M. R., E. F. Bradley, and H. Ghadiri. 1987. A wind tunnel investigation into aerodynamic effect of forest clearings on the nesting of Abbott's Booby on Christmas Island. Internal report, CSIRO Centre for Environmental Mechanics, Canberra, Australia.
43. Raupach, M. R., J. J. Finnigan, and Y. Brunet. 1996. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 78:351-382.
44. Raupach, M. R., and R. H. Shaw. 1982, Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 22:79-90,
45. Raynor, G. J., J. V. Hayes, and E. C. Ogden. 1974. Particulate dispersion into and within a forest. Boundary-Laver Meteorology 7:429-456.
46. Rhie, C. M., and W. L. Chow. 1983. Numerical study of turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 21:1525-1532.
47. Sanz, C. 2003. A note on κ-ε modelling of vegetation canopy air-flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 108:191-197.
48. Schuepp, P. H., M. Y. Leclerc, J. I. Macpherson, and R. L. Desjardins. 1990. Footprint prediction of scalar fluxes from analytical solutions of the diffusion equation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 50:353-373.
49. Shaw, R. Ft., and U. Schumann. 1992. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary Layer Meteorology 61:47-64.
50. Shen, S, and M. Y. Leclerc. 1997. Modelling the turbulence structure in the canopy layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 87:3-25,
51. Sogachev, A., M. Y. Leclerc, A. Karipot, G. Zhang, and T. Vesala. 2005a. Effect of clearcuts on footprints and flux measurements above a forest canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 133:182-196.
52. Sogachev, A., and J. Lloyd. 2004. Using a one-and-a-half order closure model of the atmospheric boundary layer for surface flux footprint estimation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 112: 467-502.
53. Sogachev, A., G. Menzhulin, M. Heimann, and J. Lloyd. 2002. A simple three dimensional canopy-planetary boundary layer simulation model for scalar concentrations and fluxes. Tellus 54B:784-819.
54. Sogachev, A., and O. Panferov. 2006. Modification of two-equation models to account for plant drag. Boundary Layer Meteorology 121:229-266.
55. Sogachev, A., O. Panferov, G. Gravenhorst, and T. Vesala. 2005b. Numerical analysis of flux footprints for different landscapes. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 80:169-185.
56. 2 advection. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 122:139-156.
57. Van Breugel, P. B., W. Klaassen, and E. J. Moors. 1999. Fetch requirements near a forest edge. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere 24:125-131.
58. Van den Hurk, B. J. J. M., and K. G. McNaughton. 1995. Implementation of near-field dispersion in a simple two-layer surface resistance model. Journal of Hydrology 166:293-311.
59. Veen, A. W. L., W. Klaassen, B. Kruijt, and R. W. A. Hutjes. 1996. Forest edges and the soil-vegetation-atmosphere interaction at the landscape scale: the state of affairs. Progress in Physical Geography 20(3):292-310.
60. 2. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 135:202-214.
61. Wieringa, J. 1993. Representative roughness parameters for homogeneous terrain. Boundarv-Laycr Meteorology 63:323-364.
62. Wilcox, D. C. 1998. Turbulence modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, La Cañada, California, USA.
63. Wilson, J. D., J. J. Finnigan, and M. R. Raupach. 1998. A first-order closure for disturbed plant canopy flows, and its application to windflow through a canopy on a ridge. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 124: 705-732.
64. Wilson, J. D., and T. K. Flesch. 1999. Wind and remnant tree sway in forest openings III. A windflow model to diagnose spatial variation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 93: 259-282.
65. Wilson, N. R., and R. H. Shaw. 1977. A higher order closure model for canopy flow. Journal of Applied Meteorology 16: 1197-1205.
66. Yang, B., M. R. Raupach, R. H. Shaw, K. T. Paw U, and A. P. Morse. 2006. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 120:377-112.