Cardiac magnetic resonance elastography: Initial results

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 762-772

  Elgeti, Thomas ^a   Rump, Jens ^a   Hamhaber, Uwe ^a   Papazoglou, Sebastian ^a   Hamm, Bernd ^a   Braun, Jürgen ^a   Sack, Ingolf ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac function; MR elastography; Pressure; Shear modulus; Volume

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLE; ELASTOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HEART MUSCLE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; SYSTOLE; THORAX WALL; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 58149299920     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181822085     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Magorien DJ, Shaffer P, Bush CA, et al. Assessment of left ventricular pressure- volume relations using gated radionuclide angiography, echocardiography, and micromanometer pressure recordings. A new method for serial measurements of systolic and diastolic function in man. Circulation. 1983;67:844-853.
2. Covell JW, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH, et al. Comparison of the force-velocity relation and the ventricular function curve as measures of the contractile state of the intact heart. Circ Res. 1966;19:364-372.
3. Burkhoff D, Mirsky I, Suga H. Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H501-H512.
4. Kass DA. Assessment of diastolic dysfunction. Invasive modalities. Cardiol Clin. 2000;18:571-586.
5. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Trindade PT, et al. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes: comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:284-289.
6. Mewton N, Croisille P, Revel D, et al. Left ventricular postmyocardial infarction remodeling studied by combining MR-tagging with delayed MR contrast enhancement. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:219-228.
7. Hosch W, Bock M, Libicher M, et al. MR-relaxometry of myocardial tissue: significant elevation of T1 and T2 relaxation times in cardiac amyloidosis. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:636-642.
8. Oh JK, Hatle L, Tajik AJ, et al. Diastolic heart failure can be diagnosed by comprehensive two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:500-506.
9. Kasner M, Westermann D, Steendijk P, et al. Utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of diastolic function in heart failure with normal ejection fraction: a comparative Doppler-conductance catheterization study. Circulation. 2007;l 16:637-647.
10. Parker KJ, Huang SR, Musulin RA, et al. Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging". Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16: 241-246.
11. Muthupillai R, Lomas DJ, Rossman PJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science. 1995;269:1854-1857.
12. Fung Y. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissue. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993.
13. Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, et al. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology. 2007;245:458-466.
14. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:1207-1213, el202.
15. Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, et al. Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 2008;21:265-271.
16. Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:7281-7294.
17. Manduca A, Lake DS, Kruse SA, et al. Spatio-temporal directional filtering for improved inversion of MR elastography images. Med Image Anal. 2003;7:465-473.
18. Park E, Maniatty AM. Shear modulus reconstruction in dynamic elastography: time harmonic case. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:3697-3721.
19. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, et al. MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the speci- ficity of contrast- enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:l 135-1144.
20. Achenbach JD. Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1999.
21. Mirsky I, Pasipoularides A. Clinical assessment of diastolic function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1990;32:291-318.
22. Sack I, Rump J, Elgeti T, et al. MR elastography of the human heart: Noninvasive assessment of myocardial elasticity changes by shear wave amplitude variations. Magn Reson Med. 2008;in revision.
23. Klatt D, Asbach P, Rump J, et al. In vivo determination of hepatic stiffness using steady-state free precession magnetic resonance elastography. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:841-848.
24. Woodrum DA, Romano AJ, Lerman A, et al. Vascular wall elasticity measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56:593-600.
25. Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, et al. Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:323-329.
26. Aki K, Richards PG. Quantitative Seismology. Sausalito: University Science Books; 2002.
27. Elzinga G, Westerhof N. Pressure and flow generated by the left ventricle against different impedances. Circ Res. 1973;32:178-186.
28. Konofagou EE, D'Hooge J, Ophir J. Myocardial elastography-a feasibility study in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:475-482.
29. Luo J, Fujikura K, Homma S, et al. Myocardial elastography at both high temporal and spatial resolution for the detection of infarcts. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1206-1223.
30. Kanai H. Propagation of spontaneously actuated pulsive vibration in human heart wall and in vivo viscoelasticity estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005;52:1931-1942.
31. Rump J, Klatt D, Braun J, et al. Fractional encoding of harmonic motions in MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2007;57:388-395.
32. Hsu SJ, Bouchard RR, Dumont DM, et al. In vivo assessment of myocardial stiffness with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1706-1719.
33. Hayward CS, Kalnins WV, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in left ventricular chamber function. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:340-350.
34. Zile MR, Baicu CF, Gaasch WH. Diastolic heart failure-abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1953-1959.
35. Gilbert JC, Glantz SA. Determinants of left ventricular filling and of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. Circ Res. 1989;64:827-852.
36. Kass DA, Bronzwaer JG, Paulus WJ. What mechanisms underlie diastolic dysfunction in heart failure? Circ Res. 2004;94:1533-1542.
37. Borbely A, van der Velden J, Papp Z, et al. Cardiomyocyte stiffness in diastolic heart failure. Circulation. 2005; 111:774-781.
38. Alter P, Rupp H, Rominger MB, et al. A new methodological approach to assess cardiac work by pressure-volume and stress-length relations in patients with aortic valve stenosis and dilated cardiomyopathy. Pflugers Arch 2008;455:627-636.
39. Asanoi H, Kameyama T, Ishizaka S, et al. Energetically optimal left ventricular pressure for the failing human heart. Circulation. 1996;93: 67-73.