Interaction in the internet-based distance learning researches: Results of a trend analysis

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 11-19

  Karataş, Serçin ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Interaction; Internet based distance learning; References; Trend analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149296385     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anglin, G. J., & Morrison, G. R. (2000). An analysis of distance education research: Implications for the instructional technologist. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 1:189-194.
2. Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S. (2001). Review of research in distance education,1990-1999. The American Journal of Distance Education 15 (3): 5-19.
3. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46 (23), A39-A41.
4. Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Garrison, D.R. (1993). Quality and theory in distance education: Theoretical considerations. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education, New York: Routiedge.
6. Khan, B. H. (1997). Web-based instruction: What is it and why is it? In Web-based instruction, ed. B. H. Khan, 5-18. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
7. Klein, J. D. (2002). Empirical research on performance improvement. Performance Improvement Quarterly 15 (1): 99-110.
8. Koble, M., & Bunker, E. (1997). Trends in research and practice: An examination of The American Journal of Distance Education 1987 to 1995. The American Journal of Distance Education 11 (2): 19-38.
9. Kristof, R., & Satran, A. (1995). Interactivity by design: Creating and communicating with new media. Mountain View, CA: Adobe Press.
10. Lee, Y., Driscoll, M.P. & Nelson, D.W. (2004). The Past, Present, and Future of Research in Distance Education: Results of a Content Analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 18 (4): 225-241
11. Lee, J. & Gibson, C.C. (2003). Developing self-direction in an online course through computer-mediated interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17 (3), 173-187.
12. Moore, M.G. & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View. Second Edition. Belmont, Ca. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
13. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
14. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organisational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
15. Russo, T.C. & Campbell, S.W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium. Distance Education, 25(2), 215-232.
16. Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1 (4): 337-365.
17. Sims, R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87-103.
18. Song, H.D. (2003). Development of a systemic assessment framework for analyzing interaction in online environments. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(4), 437-444.
19. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organisations. Communication Research, 14(5), 553-574.
20. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50-88.