Algorithms for exact multi-object muscle wrapping and application to the deltoid muscle wrapping around the humerus

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine

Volumn 222, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1081-1095

  Marsden, S P ^a   Swailes, D C ^a   Johnson, G R ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

energy methods; geodesics; global optimization; muscle wrapping; shoulder modelling

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MODEL; COMPOSITE SPHERES; COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; ELASTIC STRINGS; ENERGY METHOD; ENERGY METHODS; ENERGY MINIMIZATION; EXACT SOLUTION; IN-VIVO; ITERATIVE APPROACH; LINES OF ACTION; MULTIOBJECT; MULTIPLE SURFACES; MUSCLE FORCE; MUSCLE WRAPPING; SHORTEST GEODESIC; BIO-MECHANICAL MODELS; GEODESICS; WRAPPING TECHNIQUES;

BIOMECHANICS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; SPHERES; ALGORITHMS; GEOMETRY; MUSCLE;

MUSCLE; ITERATIVE METHODS;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMERUS; PHYSIOLOGY; SHOULDER; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; HUMERUS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 58149289643     PISSN: 09544119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544119JEIM378     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Charlton, I. W. and Johnson, G. R. Application of spherical and cylindrical wrapping algorithms in a musculoskeletal model of the upper limb. J. Biomechanics, 2001, 34(9), 1209-1216.
2. Van Der Helm, F. C. T. and Veenbaas, R. Modelling the effect of muscles with large attachment sites: application to the shoulder mechanism. J. Biomechanics, 1991, 24, 1151-1163.
3. Jensen, R. H. and Davy, D. T. An investigation of muscle lines of action about the hip: a centroid line approach vs the straight line approach. J. Biomechanics, 1975, 8, 103-110.
4. Blemker, S. S. and Delp, S. L. Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries. Ann. Biomed. Engng, 2005, 33, 661-673.
5. Johnson, G. R., Spalding, D., Nowitzke, A., and Bogduk, N. Modelling the muscles of the scapula morphometric and coordinate data and functional implications. J. Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 1039-1051.
6. An, K. N., Hui, F. C., Morrey, B. F., Linscheid, R. L., and Chao, E. Y. Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. J. Biomechanics, 1981, 14, 659-669.
7. Dumas, G. A., Poulin, M. J., Roy, B., Gagnon, M., and Jovanovic, M. Orientation and moment arms of some trunk muscles. Spine, 1991, 16, 293-303.
8. Herzog, W. and Read, L. J. Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. J. Anatomy, 1993, 182, 213-230.
9. Rugg, S. G., Gregor, R. J., Mandelbaum, B. R., and Chiu, L. In vivo moment arm calculations at the ankle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23(5), 495-501.
10. Koolstra, J. H., Van Eijden, T. M., and Weijs, W. A. An iterative procedure to estimate muscle lines of action in vivo. J. Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 911-920.
11. Hogfors, C., Sigholm, G., and Herberts, P. Biomechanical model of the human shoulder - I. elements. J. Biomechanics, 1987, 20(2), 157-166.
12. Van Der Helm, F. C. T., Veeger, H. E., Pronk, G. M., Van Der Woude, L. H., and Rozendal, R. H. Geometry parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder system. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25(2), 129-144.
13. Van Der Helm, F. C. T. The shoulder mechanism: a dynamical approach. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 1991.
14. Garner, B. A. and Pandy, M. G. The obstacle-set method for representing muscle paths in musculoskeletal models. Computer Meth. Biomechanics Biomed. Engng, 2000, 3(1), 1-30.
15. Marsden, S. P. and Swailes, D. C. A novel approach to the prediction of musculotendon paths. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2008, 222(1), 51-61.
16. Patrick, A. and Abdel-Malik, K. A musculoskeletal model of the upper limb for real time interaction. In Proceedings of the SAE Digital Human Modelling Conference, Physics based modelling session, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2007, pp. 1-14 (SAE International, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania).
17. Audenaert, E., Audenaert, A., de Wilde, L., and Verdonk, R. Defining the shortest path in wrapping algorithms for musculo-skeletal modeling. Computer Meth. Biomechanics Biomed. Engng, 2005, 8(4), Suppl. 1, 11.
18. Audenaert, E. and Audenaert, A. Global optimization method for spherical and cylindrical wrapping in musculoskeletal modelling. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mechanics in medicine and biology, Nanyang University, Singapore, 6-8 December 2006, pp. 458-459 (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore).
19. Charlton, I. W. and Johnson, G. R. A model for the prediction of the forces at the glenohumeral joint. Proc. IMechE, Part H: J. Engineering in Medicine, 2006, 220(H8), 801-812.
20. Pressley, A. Elementary differential geometry, 2005 (Springer-Verlag, London).
21. O'Neill, B. Elementary differential geometry, 2nd edition, 1996 (Academic Press, New York).
22. Su, H. Modelling stable filament winding on a general curved surface. In Proceedings of the 31st International SAMPE Technical Conference, 1999, p. 10 (Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Covina, California).
23. Liang, Y. D., Zou, Z. Q., and Zang, Z. F. Quasigeodesics - a new class of simple and non-slip trajectories on revolutional surfaces. In Proceedings of the 28th International SAMPE Technical Conference, 1996, pp. 10741-11079 (Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Covina, California).
24. Venkataraman, P. Applied optimization with MATLAB programming, 2001 (Wiley-Interscience, New York).
25. Delp, S. L. and Loan, J. P. A graphics-based software system to develop and anlayze models of musculoskeletal structures. Computers Biology Medicine, 1995, 25, 21-34.
26. Wu, G., Van Der Helm, F. C. T., Veeger, H. E., Makhsous, M., Van Roy, P., Anglin, C., Nagels, J., Karduna, A. R., McQuade, K., Wang, X., Werner, F. W., and Bucholz, B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion - part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J. Biomechanics, 2005, 38(5), 981-992.
27. Gao, F., Damsgaard, M., Rasmussen, J., and Christensen, S. T. Calculating muscle line-of-action for musculo-skeletal modeling. Biol. Cybernetics, 2002, 87, 199-210.
28. Vondrák, V., Damsgaard, M., Christensen, S. T., and Rasmussen, J. Muscle wrapping modelling in biomechanical simulations. In Biomechanics of Man 2004, Congress of the Czech Society of Biomechanics (Ed. M. Horák), November 2004, available on CD-ROM (Czech Society of Biomechanics, Prague).
29. Dhaher, Y. Y. and Kahn, L. E. The effect of vastus medialis forces on patello-femoral contact: a model-based study. J. Biomech. Engng, 2002, 124(6), 758-767.
30. Carman, A. B. and Milburn, P. D. Dynamic coordinate data for describing muscle-tendon paths: a mathematical approach. J. Biomechanics, 2005, 38(4), 943-951.
31. Zwillinger, P. CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae, 30th edition, 1996 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida).
32. Charlton, I. W. and Johnson, G. R. Application of spherical and cylindrical wrapping algorithms in a musculoskeletal model of the upper limb. J. Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 1209-1216.