Patient attitudes toward genotyping in an urban women's health clinic

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 112, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1023-1028

  Haas, David M ^a   Renbarger, Jamie L ^b   Meslin, Eric M ^b   Drabiak, Katherine ^b   Flockhart, David ^b  

^a WISHARD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DNA DETERMINATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNOWLEDGE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALIVA ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PHLEBOTOMY; PREGNANCY; SALIVA;

DNA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; DNA; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PHLEBOTOMY; PREGNANCY; SALIVA; SPECIMEN HANDLING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149288644     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318187e77f     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Coughlin SS. The intersection of genetics, public health, and preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med 1999;16:89-90.
2. Ensom MH, Chang TK, Patel P. Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future? Clin Pharmacokinet 2001;40:783-802.
3. Caulfield T, Brown R, Meslin EM. Challenging a well established consent norm?: one time consent for biobank research. J Int Biotech Law 2007;4:69-74.
4. Stolt UG, Liss PE, Svensson T, Ludvigsson J. Attitudes to bioethical issues: a case study of a screening project. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:1333-44.
5. Wendler D. One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ 2006;332:544-7.
6. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006;16:433-40.
7. Helft PR, Champion VL, Eckles R, Johnson CS, Meslin EM. Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empirical Res Hum Res Ethics 2007;2:15-22.
8. Stolt UG, Helgesson G, Liss PE, Svensson T, Ludvigsson J. Information and informed consent in a longitudinal screening involving children: a questionnaire survey. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:376-83.
9. Danzer E, Holzgreve W, Troeger C, Kostka U, Steimann S, Bitzer J, et al. Attitudes of Swiss mothers toward unrelated umbilical cord blood banking 6 months after donation. Transfusion 2003;43:604-8.
10. Welcome-Trust. Public perceptions of the collection of human biological samples 2002. Available at: www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ docs/perceptions.pdf. Retrieved May 17, 2007.
11. Emery J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A. A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Fam Pract 1999;16:426-45.
12. Gustafsson Stolt U, Liss PE, Ludvigsson J. Nurses' views of longitudinal genetic screening of and research on children. Br J Nurs 2005;14:71-7.
13. Fernandez CV, Gordon K, Van den Hof M, Taweel S, Baylis F. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women with regard to collection, testing and banking of cord blood stem cells. CMAJ 2003;168:695-8.
14. Aagaard-Tillery K, Sibai B, Spong CY, Momirova V, Wendel G Jr, Wenstrom K, et al. Sample bias among women with retained DNA samples for future genetic studies. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1115-20.
15. Swen JJ, Huizinga TW, Gelderblom H, de Vries EG, Assen-delft WJ, Kirchheiner J, et al. Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic. PLoS Med 2007;4:e209.
16. van Bebber S, Liang S, Phillips K, Marshall D, Walsh J, Kulin N. Valuing personalized medicine: willingness to pay for genetic testing for colorectal cancer risk. Personalized Med 2007;4:341-50.
17. Siminoff LA, Arnold R. Increasing organ donation in the African-American community: altruism in the face of an untrustworthy system. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:607-9.
18. Siminoff LA, Burant C, Youngner SJ. Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2004;14:217-34.
19. Catz DS, Green NS, Tobin JN, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Kyler P, Umemoto A, et al. Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genet 2005;8: 161-72.
20. Wilson RD. Genomics: new technology for obstetrics. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2005;27:63-75.
21. Ng DP, Koh D, Choo S, Chia KS. Saliva as a viable alternative source of human genomic DNA in genetic epidemiology. Clin Chim Acta 2006;367:81-5.
22. Quinque D, Kittler R, Kayser M, Stoneking M, Nasidze I. Evaluation of saliva as a source of human DNA for population and association studies. Anal Biochem 2006;353:272-7.
23. French DJ, Archard CL, Andersen MT, McDowell DG. Ultra-rapid DNA analysis using HyBeacon probes and direct PCR amplification from saliva. Mol Cell Probes 2002;16:319-26.
24. Meslin EM, Rooney PM, Wolf JG. Health-Related Philanthropy: Toward Understanding the Relationship Between the Donation of the Body (and Its Parts) and Traditional Forms of Philanthropic Giving. Nonprofit Voluntary Sector Q 2008;37:44S-62S.