Scattering fidelity in elastodynamics. II. Further experimental results

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2008, Pages

  Lobkis, Oleg I ^a   Weaver, Richard L ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; MATRIX ALGEBRA; RANDOM PROCESSES;

ALUMINUM BLOCKS; ELASTO DYNAMICS; FIDELITY DECAYS; GAUSSIAN; IRREGULAR OBJECTS; MODEL STATISTICS; POISSONIAN; RANDOM MATRIX THEORIES; RAY DYNAMICS; REFLECTION SYMMETRIES; SCATTERING FIDELITIES; TIME DEPENDENCES;

FORECASTING;

EID: 58149279453     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.066212     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Oleg Lobkis and Richard Weaver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 254302 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.254302
2. R. Schäfer, H.-J. Stöckmann, T. Gorin, and T. H. Seligman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 184102 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.184102
3. T. Gorin, T. H. Seligman, and R. L. Weaver, Phys. Rev. E 73, 015202 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.015202
4. R. Schafer, T. Gorin, H.-J. Stockmann, and T. H. Seligman, New J. Phys. 7, 152 (2005). 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/152
5. T. Prosen, T. Seligman, and M. Znidaric, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 150, 200 (2003). 10.1143/PTPS.150.200
6. T. Gorin, T. Prosen, and T. H. Seligman, New J. Phys. 6, 20 (2004). 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/020
7. John Burkhardt, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3168 (1997); 10.1121/1.419124
8. Oleg I. Lobkis, Richard L. Weaver, and Igor Rozhkov, J. Sound Vib. 237, 281 (2000) The number of channels and their coupling strengths are difficult to estimate from the data unless there are very few. If, however, one makes the assumption that all channels are equally coupled, one can often fit to a decay profile of the form E (t) = E0, [1+2σt]-M/2, where M is the number of channels and σ is the initial decay rate. 10.1006/jsvi.2000.3057
9. Oleg Lobkis, Igor Rozhkov, and Richard Weaver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 194101 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.194101
10. U. Kuhl, H.-J. Stockmann, and R. Weaver, J. Phys. A 38, 10433 (2005). 10.1088/0305-4470/38/49/001
11. R. L. Weaver, Phys. Rev. E 76, 051122 (2007); 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.051122
12. Richard L. Weaver and Oleg I. Lobkis, J. Sound Vib. 231, 1111 (2000). 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2725
13. F. E. Stanke and G. Kino, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 665 (1984). 10.1121/1.390577
14. M. Dupuis, R. Mazo, and L. Onsager, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 1452 (1960). 10.1063/1.1731426
15. Richard L. Weaver and Oleg I. Lobkis, Ultrasonics 38, 491 (2000). 10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00047-5
16. T. A. Brody, J. Flores, J. B. French, P. A. Mello, A. Pandey, and S. S. M. Wong, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 385 (1981). 10.1103/RevModPhys.53.385
17. It is perhaps not widely appreciated that ostensibly regular elastodynamic bodies, when attention is confined to an irreducible symmetry class, exhibit what appear to be GOE level statistics unlike scalar waves [K. Schaadt, A. P. B. Tufaile, and C. Ellegaard, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026213 (2003)]. This is in part due to mode conversion at free surfaces and in part to the strong diffraction at corners and edges. 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026213
18. Y. Adamov, I. V. Gornyi, and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. E 67, 056217 (2003); 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.056217
19. G. S. Ng, J. Bodyfelt, and T. Kottos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 256404 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.256404
20. H.-J. Stöckmann and R. Schäfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 244101 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.244101
21. R. Weaver, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 1608 (1982). 10.1121/1.387816