Obstacles to a regulated cannabis market

Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 798-

  Hall, Wayne ^a   Room, Robin ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c TURNING POINT ALCOHOL AND DRUG CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANNABINOID; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE;

BRAIN FUNCTION; CRIMINAL LAW; DRUG CONTROL; DRUG INHIBITION; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG MARKETING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; PSYCHOSIS; SHORT SURVEY; SMOKING;

EID: 58149263182     PISSN: 07067437     EISSN: 14970015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/070674370805301204     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Hall WD. The contribution of research to the development of a national cannabis policy in Australia. Addiction. 2008;103:712-720.
2. Hall WD. A cautious case for cannabis depenalization. In: Earleywine M, editor. Pot politics: marijuana and the costs of prohibition. London (GB): Oxford University Press; 2007. p 91-112.
3. Moore TH, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, et al. Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2007;370:319-328.
4. Dyer O. Government tightens rules on cannabis despite recommendation not to do so. BMJ. 2008;336:1095.
5. Murray RM, Morrison PD, Henquet C, et al. Cannabis, the mind and society: the hash realities. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:885-895.
6. Iversen L. The science of marijuana. 2nd ed. Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press; 2007.
7. Bonnie RJ, Stratton K, Wallace AL, editors. Ending the tobacco problem: a blue-print for the nation. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2007.