Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and scintigraphy in patients with metastatic breast cancer of the axial skeleton: A comparative study

Medical Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 257-263

  Yilmaz, Mehmet Halit ^a   Ozguroglu, Mustafa ^a,b   Mert, Devrim ^a   Turna, Hande ^a   Demir, Gökhan ^a   Adaletli, Ibrahim ^a   Ulus, Sila ^a   Halac, Metin ^a   Kanberoǧlu, Kaya ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bone metastasis; Bone scan; Breast cancer; MRI

Indexed keywords

MEDRONATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; BISPHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; TECHNETIUM 99M METHYLENE BISPHOSPHONATE; TECHNETIUM COMPLEX; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BONE ATROPHY; BONE METASTASIS; BONE PAIN; BONE SCINTISCANNING; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SPINE METASTASIS; WHOLE BODY SCINTISCANNING; BONE TUMOR; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METASTASIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE NEOPLASMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIPHOSPHONATES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 58149252811     PISSN: 13570560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-007-9027-x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. SH Landis T Murray S Bolden 1999 Cancer statistics CA Cancer J Clin 49 8 31
2. DJ Perez TJ Powles J Milan 1983 Detection of breast carcinoma metastases in bone: relative merits of x-rays and skeletal scintigraphy Lancet 2 613 6
3. N Rossing O Munck SP Nielsen KW Andersen 1982 What do early bone scans tell about breast cancer patients? Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 18 629 36
4. C Altehoefer N Ghanem S Hogerle E Moser M Langer 2000 Comparative detectability of bone metastases and impact on therapy of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer Eur J Radiol 40 16 23
5. MM Sherry FA Greco DH Johnson JD Hainsworth 1986 Metastatic breast cancer confined to the skeletal system Am J Med 81 381 6
6. MM Sherry FA Greco DH Johnson JD Hainsworth 1986 Breast cancer with skeletal metastases at initial diagnosis. Distinctive clinical characteristics and favorable prognosis Cancer 58 178 82
7. JD Schocker LW Brady 1982 Radiation therapy for bone metastasis Clin Orthoped Rel Res 169 38 43
8. HA Gilbert R Kagan 1977 Evaluation of radiation therapy for bone metastases: pain relief and quality of life Am J Roentgenol 129 1095
9. C Kamby I Vejborg S Daugaard B Guldhammer H Dirkson N Rossing HAT Mouridson 1987 Clinical and radiological characteristics of bone metastases in breast cancer Cancer 60 2524 31
10. PJ Ryan I Fogelmen 1995 The bone scan: where are we now? Semin Nucl Med 25 76 91
11. DI Rosenthal 1997 Radiologic diagnosis of bone metastases Cancer 80 Suppl 8 1595 607
12. RH Daffner AR Lupetin N Dash ZL Deeb RJ Sefczek RL Schapiro 1986 MRI in the detection of malignant infiltration of bone marrow Am. J. Roentgenol 146 353 8
13. BR Hoane AF Shields BA Porter 1991 Detection of lymphomatous bone marrow involvement with magnetic resonance imaging Blood 78 728 38
14. SM Sanal FW Flickinger MJ Caudell RM Sherry 1994 Detection of bone marrow involvement in breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging J. Clin Oncol 12 1415 21
15. WTC Yuh CK Zachar TJ Barloon Y Sato WJ Sickels DR Hawes 1989 Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging Radiology 172 215 8
16. S Eustace R Tello V DeCarvalho J Carey JT Wroblicka ER Melhem EK Yucel 1997 A comparison of whole-body turboSTIR MR imaging and planar 99 mTc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 1655 61
17. SV Kattapuram JS Khurana JA Scott G El Khoury 1990 Negative scintigraphy with positive magnetic resonance imaging in bone metastasis Skeletal Radiol 19 204 7
18. FA Aitchison FW Poon MD Hadley HW Gray AW Forrester 1992 Vertebral metastases and equivocal bone scan: value of magnetic resonance imaging Nucl Med Commun 13 429 31
19. ME Schweitzer C Levine DG Mitchell FH Gannon LG Gomella 1993 Bull's-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases Radiology 188 249 52
20. Marcove RC, Arlen M. Atlas of bone pathology: with clinical and radiographic correlations. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1992. p. 14-21.
21. CSB Galasko 1986 Skeletal metastases Clin Orthop 210 18 30
22. E Viadana IDJ Bross JW Pickren 1973 An autopsy study of some routes of dissemination of cancer of the breast Br J Cancer 27 336 40
23. JS Bunting EH Hemsted JK Kremer 1976 The pattern of spread and survival in 596 cases of breast cancer related to clinical staging and histological grade Clin Radiol 27 9 15
24. WT Yuh JP Quets HJ Lee 1996 Anatomic distribution of metastases in the vertebral body and modes of hematogenous spread Spine 21 2243 50
25. TH Thrall BI Ellis 1987 Skeletal metastases Radiol Clin North Am 25 1155 70
26. R Kamholtz G Sze 1991 Current imaging in spinal metastatic disease Semin Oncol 18 158 69
27. D Delbeke TA Powers MP Sandler 1989 Correlative radionuclide and magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of the spine Clin Nucl Med 14 742 9
28. RH Gold LW. Bassett 1986 Radionuclide evaluation of skeletal metastases: practical considerations Skeletal Radiol 15 1 19
29. RH Gold LL Seeger LW Bassett RJ Steckel 1990 An integrated approach to the evaluation of metastatic bone disease Radiol Clin North Am 28 471 83
30. J Kosuda T Kaji H Yokoyama 1996 Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI? J Nucl Med 37 975 8
31. BG Haubold-Reuter S Duewell BR Schilcher B Marincek GK von Schulthess 1993 The value of bone scintigraphy, bone marrow scintigraphy and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging in staging of patients with malignant solid tumours: a prospective study Eur J Nucl Med 20 1063 9
32. HJ Mentzel K Kentouche D Sauner C Fleischmann S Vogt D Gottschild F Zintl WA Kaiser 2004 Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and 99 mTc-methylene- diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions Eur Radiol 14 2297 302
33. E Avrahami R Tadmor O Dally H Hadar 1989 Early MR demonstration of spinal metastases in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 598 602
34. JA Frank A Ling NJ Patronas JA Carrasquillo K Horvath AM Hickey AJ Dwyer 1990 Detection of malignant bone tumors: MR imaging vs scintigraphy AJR Am J Roentgenol 155 1043 8
35. PM Colletti HT Dang MW Deseran RM Kerr WD Boswell PW Ralls 1991 Spinal MR imaging in suspected metastases: correlation with skeletal scintigraphy Magn Reson Imaging 9 349 55
36. RC Mehta MA Wilson SB Perlman 1989 False-negative bone scan in extensive metastatic disease: CT and MR findings J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 717 9
37. E Gosfield 3rd A Alavi B Kneeland 1993 Comparison of radionuclide bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting spinal metastases J Nucl Med 34 2191 8
38. Y Fujii Y Higashi F Owada T Okuno H Mizuno H Mizuno 1995 Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of prostate cancer metastatic to bone Br J Urol 75 54 8
39. FW Flickinger SM Sanal 1994 Bone marrow MRI: techniques and accuracy for detecting breast cancer metastases Magn Reson Imaging 12 829 35
40. MM Steinborn AF Heuck R Tiling M Bruegel L Gauger MF Reiser 1999 Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system J Comput Assist Tomogr 23 123 9
41. KM Jones EC Unger P Granstrom JF Seeger RF Carmody M Yoshino 1992 Bone marrow imaging using STIR at 0.5 and 1.5 T Magn Reson Imaging 10 169 76