Publication ethics: Clinical Chemistry editorial standards

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-4

  Annesley, Thomas M ^a   Boyd, James C ^b   Rifai, Nader ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

AUTHORSHIP; CHEMISTRY, CLINICAL; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 58149250239     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: 15308561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.120055     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. A statement on ethics from the HEART group. Circulation 2008;117:2400-2.
2. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005;435:737-8.
3. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. http://www.icmje.org/ (Accessed October 2008).
4. Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher's perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2007;61:1-26.
5. Neill US. Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Invest 2008;118:2368.
6. McCook A. Is peer review broken? Scientist 2006;20:26-34.