Dragonfly larvae and tadpole frog space use games in varied light conditions

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-21

  Luttbeg, Barney ^a,b   Hammond, John I ^a   Sih, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Movement rules; Predator and prey spatial distributions; Spatial games

Indexed keywords

DRAGONFLY; LARVA; LIGHT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDATION; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; TOAD;

ANAX; ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLIES); ANURA; HYLIDAE; PSEUDACRIS REGILLA;

EID: 58149236895     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arn107     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams P. 1980. Some comments on measuring niche overlap. Ecology. 61:44-49.
2. Abrams PA, Cressman R, Krivan V. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distributions of interacting species. Am Nat. 169:505-518.
3. Alonzo SH. 2002. State-dependent habitat selection games between predators and prey: the importance of behavioural interactions and expected lifetime reproductive success. Evol Ecol Res. 4:759-778.
4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer.
5. Caro TM. 2005. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Cohen J. 1994. The earth is round (p < .05). Am Psychol. 49: 997-1003.
7. Fretwell SD, Lucas HL. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biot. 19:16-36.
8. Fryxell JM, Lundberg P. 1997. Individual behavior and community dynamics. New York: Chapman and Hall.
9. Hammond JI, Luttbeg B, Sih A. 2007. Predator and prey space use: dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game. Ecology. 88: 1525-1535.
10. Heithaus MR. 2001. Habitat selection by predators and prey in communities with asymmetrical intraguild predation. Oikos. 92:542-554.
11. Hilborn R, Mangel M. 1997. The ecological detective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
12. Hoff KsV, Blaustein AR, McDiarmid RW, Altig R. 1999. Behavior: interactions and their consequences. In: McDiarmid RW, Altig R, editors. Tadploes: the biology of anuran larvae. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p. 215-239.
13. Houston AI, McNamara JM. 1999. Models of adaptive behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hugie DM, Dill LM. 1994. Fish and game: a game theoretical approach to habitat selection by predators and prey. J Fish Biol. 45: 151-169.
15. Jackson AL, Ranta E, Lundberg P, Kaitala V, Ruxton GD. 2004. Consumer - resource matching in a food chain when both predators and prey are free to move. Oikos. 106:445-450.
16. Johansson F. 1993. Intraguild predation and cannibalism in odonate larvae: effects of foraging behaviour and zooplankton availability. Oikos. 66:80-87.
17. Johnson DM, Crowley PH. 1980. Odonate "hide-and-seek": habitat specific rules? In: Kerfoot WC, editor. The evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. Hanover (NH): University Press of New England. p. 569-579.
18. Johnson DM, Crowley PH, Bohanan RE, Watson CN, Martin TH. 1985. Competition among larval dragonflies: a field enclosure experiment. Ecology. 66:119-128.
19. Johnson DM, Martin TH, Mahato M, Crowder LB, Crowley PH. 1995. Predation, density dependence, and life histories of dragonflies: a field experiment in a freshwater community. J North Am Benthol Soc. 14:547-562.
20. Kacelnik A, Krebs JR, Bernstein C. 1992. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 7:50-55.
21. Krebs CJ. 1999. Ecological methodology. Menlo Park (CA): Benjamin Cummings.
22. Lima SL. 1998. Stress and decision-making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive and ecological perspectives. Adv Study Behav. 27:215-290.
23. Lima SL. 2002. Putting predators back into behavioral predator-prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol. 17:70-75.
24. Luttbeg B, Sih A. 2004. Predator and prey habitat selection games: the effects of how prey balance foraging and predation risk. Isr J Zool. 50:233-254.
25. Ranta E, Lundberg P, Kaitala V. 1999. Resource matching with limited knowledge. Oikos. 91:507-511.
26. Roth TC, Lima SL. 2007. Use of prey hotspots by an avian predator: purposeful unpredictability. Am Nat. 169:264-273.
27. Sih A. 1984. The behavioral-response race between predator and prey. Am Nat. 123:143-150.
28. Sih A. 1998. Game theory and predator-prey response races. In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK, editors. Game theory and animal behavior. London: Oxford University Press. p. 221-238.
29. Sih A. 2005. Predator-prey space use as an emergent outcome of a behavioral response race. In: Barbosa P, Castellanos I, editors. Ecology of predator-prey interactions. London: Oxford University Press. p. 241-255.
30. Sih A, Kats LB, Moore RD. 1992. Effects of predatory sunfish on the density, drift, and refuge use of stream salamander larvae. Ecology. 73:1418-1430.
31. Steiger JH, Fouladi RT. 1997. Noncentrality interval estimation and evaluation of statistical models. In: Harlow LL, Mulaik SA, Steiger JH, editors. What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 221-257.
32. Stephens DW, Krebs JR. 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Tregenza T. 1995. Building on the ideal free distribution. Adv Ecol Res. 26:253-307.
34. Walde SJ, Murdoch WW. 1988. Spatial density dependence in parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol. 33:441-466.