Vi bør bli bedre til å dosere antibiotika

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 128, Issue 23, 2008, Pages 2750-

  Høiby, E Arne ^a   Walstad, Rolf A ^b,c  

^a Folkehelseinstituttet   (Norway)

^b TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HUMAN; NOTE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 58149231207     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: 08077096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1-12.
2. Amsden GW. Tables of antimicrobial agent pharmacology. I: Mandrell GL, Bennett JL, Dolin R, red. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 6. utg. Baltimore, MD: Churchill Livingstone, 2005: 634-700.
3. Amsden GW, Ballow CH, Bertino JS jr. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiinfective agents. I: Mandrell GL, Bennett JL, Dolin R, red. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 6. utg. Baltimore, MD: Churchill Livingstone, 2005: 271-81.
4. Schentag JJ, Gilliland KK, Palandino JA. What have we learned from pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic theories? Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32 (suppl 1): 39-46.