Electronic patient record data as proxy of GPs' thoughts

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 141, Issue , 2008, Pages 103-110

  De Clercq, Etienne ^a   Van Casteren, Viviane ^b   Jonckheer, Pascale ^c   Burggraeve, Peter ^d   Lafontaine, Marie France ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^c Société Scientifique de Médecine Géné rale SSMG   (Belgium)

^d Domus Medica (Flemish Institute of General Practitioners)   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Computerized patient records; Data collection; Medical records; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; DIAGNOSIS; EXTRACTION; HEALTH CARE; MICROWAVE INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SURVEYS;

COMPUTERIZED PATIENT RECORD; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC PATIENT RECORD; ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE; HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS; MEDICAL RECORD; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUES; PRIMARY HEALTHCARE;

DATA MINING;

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL RECORD; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING;

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MARITAL STATUS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING;

EID: 58149229763     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-922-6-103     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006; 23:253-63.
2. De Clercq E, Van Casteren V, Jonckheer P, Burggraeve P et al. Research networks: can we use data from GPs' Electronic health Records. Stud.Health Technol. Inform. 2006; 124:181-6.
3. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51(11):1611-25
4. Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, et al.. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 12(11):782-8.
5. Kerr EA, Smith DM, Hogan MM, Krein SL, et al.. Comparing clinical automated medical record, and hybrid data sources for diabetes quality measures. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002; 28(10):555-65.
6. Kirk SA, Campbell SM, et al. Assessing the quality of care of multiple conditions in general practice: practical and methodological problems. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12(6):421-7
7. Rector AL et al. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Meth Inf Med 1991;30:179-86.
8. De Clercq E, Van Casteren V, et al. Resoprim - Are GPs' Electronic Health Records suitable for use in Public health Research?, Scientific Institute of Public Health ed., Brussels, January 2008, 64 pp. Report D/2008/2505/03. http://www.iph.fgov.be/epidemio/epien/re-pr-en/D-2008-2505-03.pdf
9. Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ 2003;326:1070.
10. Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P. How Well Does Chart Abstraction measure Quality? A Prospective Comparison of Standardized Patients with the Medical Record. The American Journal of Medicine 2000; 108:642-49.
11. Nicole Boffin, Van Casteren V, et al. P. Elektronische dossiergegevens en kwaliteit van zorg: ervaring uit Resoprim over hypertensiepatiënten. Huisarts Nu. 2008;37(3):131-38.