Do New Caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 276, Issue 1655, 2009, Pages 247-254

  Taylor, A H ^a   Hunt, G R ^a   Medina, F S ^a   Gray, R D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Analogical reasoning; Causal reasoning; New Caledonian crows; Trap table; Trap tube

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; PASSERINE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; TESTING METHOD;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKILL; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; VISION;

ANIMALIA; CORVIDAE; PRIMATES;

EID: 58149218294     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1107     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J. & Waldmann, M. R. 2006 Causal reasoning in rats. Science 311, 1020-1022.
2. Boysen, S. T., Mukobi, K. L. & Berntson, G. G. 1999 Overcoming response bias using symbolic representations of number by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim. Learn. Behav. 27, 229-235.
3. Boysen, S. T., Berntson, G. G. & Mukobi, K. L. 2001 Size matters: impact of item size and quantity on array choice by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Comp. Psychol. 115, 106-110.
4. Call, J. 2004 Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus). J. Comp. Psychol. 118, 231-242.
5. Cunningham, C. L., Anderson, J. R. & Mootnick, A. R. 2006 Object manipulation to obtain a food reward in hoolock gibbons, Bunopithecus hoolock. Anim. Behav. 71, 621-629.
6. Fujita, K., Kuroshima, H. & Asai, S. 2003 How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 29, 233-242.
7. Gentner, D. 1983 Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7, 155-170.
8. Gentner, D. & Markman, A. B. 1997 Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. Am. Psychol. 52, 45-56.
9. Ghirlanda, S. & Enquist, M. 2003 A century of generalization. Anim. Behav. 66, 15-36.
10. Girndt, A., Meier, T. & Call, J. 2008 Task constraints mask great apes' ability to solve the trap table task. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 34, 54-62.
11. Goswami, U. & Brown, A. L. 1989 Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition 35, 69-95.
12. Hauser, M. D. 1997 Artifactual kinds and functional design features: what a primate understands without language. Cognition 64, 285-308.
13. Hauser, M. & Spaulding, B. 2006 Wild rhesus monkeys generate causal inferences about possible and impossible physical transformations in the absence of experience. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 7181-7185.
14. Hauser, M. D., Kralik, J. & Botto-Mahan, C. 1999 Problem solving and functional design features: experiments on cotton-top tamarins, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Anim. Behav. 57, 565-582.
15. Hauser, M. D., Pearson, H. & Seelig, D. 2002 Ontogeny of tool use in cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus: innate recognition of functionally relevant features. Anim. Behav. 64, 299-311.
16. Heyes, C. M. 1993 Anecdotes, training, trapping, and triangulating: do animals attribute mental states? Anim. Behav. 46, 177-188.
17. Hume, D. 1739/1978 A treatise on human nature. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
18. Hunt, G. R. 1996 Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 397, 249-251.
19. Hunt, G. R. 2000a Human-like, population-level specialization in the manufacture of pandanus tools by New Caledonian crows Corvus moneduloides. Proc. R. Soc. B 267, 403-413.
20. Hunt, G. R. 2000b Tool use by the New Caledonian crow Corvus moneduloides to obtain Cerambycidae from dead wood. Emu 100, 109-114.
21. Hunt, G. R. & Gray, R. D. 2004 The crafting of hook tools by wild New Caledonian crows. Proc. R. Soc. B 271(Suppl.), S88-S90.
22. Kenward, B., Rutz, C., Weir, A. A. S., Chappell, J. & Kacelnik, A. 2004 Morphology and sexual dimorphism of the New Caledonian crow Corvus moneduloides, with notes on its behaviour and ecology. Ibis 146, 652-660.
23. Kummer, H. 1995 Causal knowledge in animals. In Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate (eds D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. J. Premack), pp. 26-39. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
24. Limongelli, L., Boysen, S. T. & Visalberghi, E. 1995 Comprehension of cause-effect relations in a tool-using task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Comp. Psychol. 109, 18-26.
25. Martin-Ordas, G., Call, J. & Colmenares, F. 2008 Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks. Anim. Cogn. 11, 423-430.
26. Mulcahy, N. J. & Call, J. 2006 How great apes perform on a modifed trap-tube task. Anim. Cogn. 9, 193-199.
27. Mundry, R. & Fischer, J. 1998 Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect p-values: examples from Animal Behaviour. Anim. Behav. 56, 256-259.
28. O'Connell, S. & Dunbar, R. I. M. 2005 The perception of causality in chimpanzees (Pan spp.). Anim. Cogn. 8, 60-66.
29. Passolunghi, M. C., Cornoldi, C. & De Liberto, S. 1999 Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Mem. Cognit. 27, 779-790.
30. Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. 2007 Causal cognition in humans and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 97-118.
31. Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. 2008 Darwin's mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behav. Brain. Sci. 31, 109-178.
32. Povinelli, D. J. 2000 Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Sabbatini, G. & Visalberghi, E. 2008 Inferences about the location of food in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in two sensory modalities. J. Comp. Psychol. 122, 156-166.
34. Santos, L. R., Pearson, H. M., Spaepen, G. M., Tsao, F. & Hauser, M. D. 2006 Probing the limits of tool competence: experiments with two non-tool-using species (Cercopithecus aethiops and Saguinus oedipus). Anim. Cogn. 9, 94-109.
35. Seed, A. M., Tebbich, S., Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. 2006 Investigating physical cognition in rooks (Corvus frugilegus). Curr. Biol. 16, 697-701.
36. Shepard, R. N. 1987 Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237, 1317-1323.
37. Silva, F. J., Page, D. M. & Silva, K. M. 2005 Methodological- conceptual problems on the study of chimpanzees' folk physics: how studies with adult humans can help. Learn. Behav. 33, 47-58.
38. Spence, K. W. 1937 The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychol. Rev. 44, 430-444.
39. Taylor, A. H., Hunt, G. R., Holzhaider, J. C. & Gray, R. D. 2007 Spontaneousmetatool use by New Caledonian crows. Curr. Biol. 17, 1504-1507.
40. Tebbich, S. & Bshary, R. 2004 Cognitive abilities related to tool use in the woodpecker finch, Cactospiza pallida. Anim. Behav. 67, 689-697.
41. Visalberghi, E. & Limongelli, L. 1994 Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol. 108, 15-22.
42. Visalberghi, E. & Tomasello, M. 1998 Primate causal understanding in the physical and psychological domains. Behav. Process. 42, 189-203.
43. Weir, A. S. & Kacelnik, A. 2006 A New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides) creatively re-designs tools by bending or unbending aluminium strips. Anim. Cogn. 9, 317-334.
44. Weir, A. S., Chappell, J. & Kacelnik, A. 2002 Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297, 981.