Functional MRI detection of deception after committing a mock sabotage crime

Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 220-231

  Andrew Kozel, F ^a,b,c   Johnson, Kevin A ^b,c   Grenesko, Emily L ^b,c   Laken, Steven J ^d   Kose, Samet ^b,c   Lu, Xinghua ^b   Pollina, Dean ^e   Ryan, Andrew ^e   George, Mark S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d Cephos Corp   (United States)

^e Defense Academy for Credibility Assessment (DACA)   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Forensic science; Functional MRI; Lie detection; Mock crime

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMPACT DISK; COMPUTER; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; FORENSIC MEDICINE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECUMBENCY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; CRIME; DECEPTION; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149190198     PISSN: 00221198     EISSN: 15564029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00927.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Lee TM, Liu HL, Tan LH, Chan CC, Mahankali S, Feng CM, et al. Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp 2002 15 (3 157 64.
2. Langleben DD, Loughead JW, Bilker WB, Ruparel K, Childress AR, Busch SI, et al. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2005 26 (4 262 72.
3. Ganis G, Kosslyn SM, Stose S, Thompson WL, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation. Cereb Cortex 2003 13 (8 830 6.
4. Kozel F, Revell L, Lorberbaum J, Shastri A, Nahas Z, Horner M, et al. Brain regions involved in deception; an fMRI study in healthy volunteers. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001 13 : 147 (Abstract).
5. Kozel FA, Johnson KA, Mu Q, Grenesko EL, Laken SJ, George MS. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Psychiat 2005 58 (8 605 13.
6. Spence SA, Farrow TF, Herford AE, Wilkinson ID, Zheng Y, Woodruff PW. Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport 2001 12 (13 2849 53.
7. Langleben DD, Schroeder L, Maldjian JA, Gur RC, McDonald S, Ragland JD, et al. Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 2002 15 (3 727 32.
8. Spence SA, Hunter MD, Farrow TF, Green RD, Leung DH, Hughes CJ, et al. A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004 359 (1451 1755 62.
9. Kozel FA, Revell LJ, Lorberbaum JP, Shastri A, Elhai JD, Horner MD, et al. A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. J Neuropsych Clin N 2004 16 (3 295 305.
10. Kozel FA, Padgett TM, George MS. A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Behav Neurosci 2004 118 (4 852 6.
11. Mohamed FB, Faro SH, Gordon NJ, Platek SM, Ahmad H, Williams JM. Brain mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation - initial experience. Radiology 2006 238 (2 679 88.
12. Davatzikos C, Ruparel K, Fan Y, Shen DG, Acharyya M, Loughead JW, et al. Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection. Neuroimage 2005 28 (3 663 8.
13. Nunez JM, Casey BJ, Egner T, Hare T, Hirsch J. Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage 2005 25 (1 267 77.
14. Phan KL, Magalhaes A, Ziemlewicz TJ, Fitzgerald DA, Green C, Smith W. Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 tesla. Acad Radiol 2005 12 : 164 72.
15. First M, Spitzer R, Williams J, Gibbon M. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Washington, DC : American Psychiatric Press, 1995.
16. Annette M. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970 61 : 303 21.
17. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Redwood City, CA : Mind Garden, Inc, 1983.
18. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993 50 (12 975 90.
19. Kircher JC, Raskin DC. Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. J Appl Psychol 1988 73 (2 291 302.
20. Hintze J. NCSS, PASS, and GESS. Kaysville, Utah : NCSS, http://www.ncss.com. Accessed October 31, 2008.
21. Bullmore E, Brammer M, Williams SC, Rabe-Hesketh S, Janot N, David A, et al. Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996 35 (2 261 77.
22. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp 1999 7 (4 254 66.
23. Friston K. Experimental design and statistical parametric mapping. In : Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Price CJ, Zeki S, et al., editors. Human brain function, 2nd ed. Amsterdam : Elsevier Academic Press, 2004 599 634.
24. Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Images of the future. In : Frackowiak RSJ, Friston KJ, Dolan RJ, Frith CD, Mazziotta JC, editors. Human brain function. San Diego, CA : Academic Press, 1997 487 517.
25. National Research Council. The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC : The National Academies Press, 2003.