Dynamic arguments in a case law domain

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 60-69

  Henderson, John ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE DESCRIPTION; CASE LAW; GENERAL PURPOSE; LEGAL REASONING; PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATIONS;

ONTOLOGY; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 58149189441     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/383535.383542     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Aleven V., Teaching Case Based Argumentation Through an Example and Models. PhD Thesis. The University of Pittsburg. 1997.
2. Ashley. K.D., (1990). Modeling Legal Argument. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
3. Henderson, J., and Bench-Capon. T., (2000). A model of the the development of distinctions in case law, in Beuker, J., Leenes, R., and Winkels, R., Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, Jurix 2000, Amsterdam, IOS Press. pp23-34..
4. Lenat, D.B., and Guha, R. V., (1990). Building Large Knowledge Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project: Addison Wesley
5. Levi, E.H., (1948). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, University of Chicago Press.
6. Miller, G.A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., and Miller, K., (1993). Introduction to WordNet: An On-Line Lexical Database: Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University
7. Montazeri, M.A., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and Adam, A.E., (1997). LASER: a System to Retrieve UK Employment Law Cases. Informations and Communications Technology Law, Vol 6 No 1, pp 41-54.
8. Prakken, H., and Sartor, G. (1996). A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4: 331-368.
9. Rissland, E.L., and Friedman, M.T., (1995). Detecting Change in Legal Concepts. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law. ACM Press: New York, 127-136.