Screening mammography: Does ethnicity influence patient preferences for higher recall rates given the potential for earlier detection of breast cancer?

Radiology

Volumn 249, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 785-791

  Nazia, F Jafri ^a   Rama, S Ayyala ^a   Ozonoff, Al ^b   Jordan Gray, Jacqueline ^a   Slanetz, Priscilla J ^a,c  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY; BREAST TUMOR; CAUCASIAN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; HISPANIC; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUP; NEGRO; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DATA COLLECTION; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 58149188970     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2493072176     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359(9310):909-919.
2. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, et al. Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 2006;144(8):541-553.
3. Polacek GN, Ramos MC, Ferrer RL. Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women. Patient Educ Couns 2007;65(2):158- 165.
4. Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med 2003;163(1):49-56.
5. Smith RA. Breast cancer screening among women younger than age 50: a current assessment of the issues. CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50(5):312-336.
6. Mushlin AI, Kouides RW, Shapiro DE. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 1998;14(2):143-153.
7. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276(1):33-38.
8. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27 825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225(1):165-175.
9. Sickles EA. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991;179(2):463- 468.
10. Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, et al. Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology 2005;234(2):363-373.
11. Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, King JL, et al. Screening mammography: do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer? Radiology 2006;238(3):793- 800.
12. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218(3):873- 880.