Knowledge claims in rhetorical criticism

Journal of Communication

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 629-640

  Zarefsky, David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 58149185283     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00405.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bitzer, L. F., & Black, E. (1971). The prospect of rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Booth, W. C. (1974). Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
3. Bowers, J. W. (1968). The pre-scientific function of rhetorical criticism. In T. R. Nilsen (Ed.), Essays in rhetorical criticism (pp. 126-145). New York: Random House.
4. Brockriede, W. (1974). Rhetorical criticism as argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 165-174.
5. Brown, R. H. (1987). Society as text: Essays on rhetoric, reason, and reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Presidents creating the presidency: Deeds done in words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Ceccarelli, L. (1998). Polysemy: Multiple meanings in rhetorical criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 395-415.
9. Edwards, G. C., III. (2003). On deaf ears: The limits of the bully pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Ehninger, D. (1970). Argument as method: Its nature, its limitations, and its uses. Speech Monographs, 37, 101-110.
11. Entman, R. M. (1993, Autumn). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
12. Fogelson, R. M., & Hill, R. B. (1968). Who riots? A study of participation in the 1967 riots. In Supplemental studies for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (pp. 221-243). New York: Praeger.
13. Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Jhally, S., & Lewis, J. (1992). Enlightened racism: The Cosby Show, audiences, and the myth of the American dream. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15. Nothstine, W. L., Blair, C., & Copeland, G. A. (Eds.). (1994). Critical questions: Invention, creativity, and the criticism of discourse and media. New York: St. Martin's Press.
16. Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 1-15.
17. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
18. Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality: Definitions and the politics of meaning. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
19. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Zarefsky, D. (1998a). Definitions. In J. F. Klumpp (Ed.), Argument in a time of change: Definitions, frameworks, and critiques (pp. 1-11). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
22. Zarefsky, D. (1998b). Four senses of rhetorical history. In K. J. Turner (Ed.), Doing rhetorical history: Concepts and cases (pp. 19-32). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
23. Zarefsky, D. (2004). Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 607-619.
24. Zarefsky, D. (2006). Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation, 20, 399-416.