Comparison of reliability between the PUMC and lenke classification systems for classifying adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 22, 2008, Pages

  Qiu, Guixing ^a   Li, Qiyi ^a   Wang, Yipeng ^a   Yu, Bin ^a   Qian, Jun ^a   Yu, Keyi ^a   Lee, Chia I ^a   Zhang, Jianguo ^a   Shen, Jianxiong ^a   Zhao, Yu ^a   Weng, Xisheng ^a   Wang, Ting ^a   Aladin, Darwesh M K ^b   Lu, Weijia William ^b  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Curve classification; Lenke; PUMC

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL SCHOOL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; SURGEON; X RAY FILM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE;

ADOLESCENT; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE;

EID: 58149184326     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318187bb10     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302-13.
2. Cummings RJ, Loveless EZ, Campbell J, et al. Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1107-11.
3. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Bri dwell KH, et al. Intra-ob server and inter-observer reliability of the classification of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1097-106.
4. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. A new and reliable 3-dimensional clas- sification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Presented at Scoliosis Research Society, St. Louis, MO, 1997.
5. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Clements D, et al. Curve prevalence of a new classification of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: does classification correlate with treatment? Spine 2002;27:604-11.
6. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Walton T, et al. Can we predict the ultimate lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing a selective fusion with under correction of the thoracic curve? Spine 2004;29:277-85.
7. Puno RM, An K, Puno RL, et al. Treatment recommendations for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:2102-15.
8. Edwards CC II, Lenke LG, Peelle M, et al. Selective thoracic fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with C modifier lumbar curves: 2- to 16- year radiographic and clinical results. Spine 2004;29:536-46.
9. Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M, et al. The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2005;30:2550-5.
10. Qiu GX, Zhang JG, Wang YP, et al. The PUMC operative classification system for idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Orthopedics 2003;23:l-9.
11. Qiu GX, Zhang JG, Wang YP, et al. A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis: a Peking Union Medical College method. Spine 2005;30: 1419-26.
12. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169-81.
13. Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ, et al. Reproducibility of histomor-phologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic. APMIS 1989;97:689-98.
14. McCance S, Denis F, Lonstein J, et al. Coronal and sagittal balance in surgically treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the King II curve pattern. Spine 1998;23:2063-73.
15. Ibrahim K, Benson L. Contrel-Dubousset instrumentation for double major right thoracic left lumbar scoliosis, the relation between frontal balance, hook configuration, and fusion levels abstract. Orthop Trans 1991;15:114.
16. Roye DP, Farcy JP, Rickert JB, et al. Results of spinal instrumentation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by King Type. Spine 1992;17:S270-S273.
17. Knapp DR, Price CT, Jones ET, et al. Choosing fusion levels in progressive thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1992;17:1159-65.
18. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR, et al. Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine 2001;26:2347-53.
19. Ogon M, Giesinger K, Behensky H, et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of Lenke's new scoliosis classification system. Spine 2002;27: 858-63.
20. Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs: intra-observer and inter-observer variation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:328-33.
21. Morrissey RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis: evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:320-7.
22. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Polly DW Jr., et al. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements. Spine 2005;3 0:444-54.
23. Dang NR, Moreau MJ, Hill DL, et al. Intra-observer reproducibility and inter-observer reliability of the radiographic parameters in the spinal deformity study group's AIS radiographic measurement manual. Spine 2005;30: 1064-9.
24. Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, et al. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured. Spine 2003 ;28: 1148-57.