Access site management after peripheral percutaneous transluminal procedures: Neptune pad compared with conventional manual compression

Radiology

Volumn 249, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 1058-1063

  Mlekusch, Wolfgang ^a   Minar, Erich ^a   Dick, Petra ^a   Sabeti, Schila ^a   Bartok, Andrea ^a   Haumer, Markus ^a   Bonelli, Michael ^a   Vormittag, Laurenz ^a   Koppensteiner, Renate ^a   Schillinger, Martin ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMOSTASIS; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVENTION STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND DRESSING; BANDAGE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; INSTRUMENTATION; PATIENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ALGINIC ACID; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGINATES; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; BANDAGES; FEMALE; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HEXURONIC ACIDS; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENTS; PRESSURE; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 58149182787     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2492080181     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arora N, Matheny ME, Sepke C, Resnic FS. A propensity analysis of the risk of vascular complications after cardiac catheterization procedures with the use of vascular closure devices. Am Heart J 2007;153:606-611.
2. Dangas G, Mehran R, Kokolis S, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:638-641.
3. Waksman R, King SB, Douglas JS, et al. Predictors of groin complications after balloon and new-device coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:886-889.
4. Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, et al. Vascular complications after balloon and new device angioplasty. Circulation 1993;88:1569-1578.
5. Katzenschlager R, Uguruoglu A, Ahmadi A, et al. Incidence of pseudoaneurysm after diagnostic and therapeutic angiography. Radiology 1995;195:463-466.
6. Exaire JE, Tcheng JE, Kereiakes DJ, et al. Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:369-372.
7. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:349-356.
8. Chevalier B, Lancelin B, Koning R, et al. Effect of a closure device on complication rates in high-local-risk patients: results of a randomized multi-center trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;58:285-291.
9. Rickli H, Unterweger M, Sutsch G, et al. Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;57:297-302.
10. Wetter DR, Rickli H, von Smekal A, Amann FW. Early sheath removal after coronary artery interventions with use of a suture-mediated closure device: clinical outcome and results of Doppler US evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:1033-1037.
11. Kornowski R, Brandes S, Teplitsky I, et al. Safety and efficacy of a 6 French perclose arterial suturing device following percutaneous coronary interventions: a pilot evaluation. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14:741-745.
12. Meyerson SL, Feldman T, Desai TR, Leef J, Schwartz LB, McKinsey JF. Angiographic access site complications in the era of arterial closure devices. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2002;36:137-144.
13. Lewis-Carey MB, Kee ST. Complications of arterial closure devices. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;6:103-106.
14. Wagner SC, Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL, Bonn J. Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case controlled study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:735-741.
15. Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, Valentine MC, Nygaard TW. Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:3-8.
16. Kussmaul WG, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:1685-1692.
17. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand- Handanweisung. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 1998.
18. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974;2:1127-1131.
19. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976;2:175-184.
20. Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, Suttorp MJ, van de Pavoordt ED, de Vries JP. Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20:278-281.
21. Mlekusch W, Dick P, Haumer M, Sabeti S, Minar E, Schillinger M. Arterial puncture site management after percutaneous transluminal procedures using a hemostatic wound dressing (Clo-Sur P.A.D.) versus conventional manual compression: a randomised controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:23-31.