Should only live diatoms be used in the bioassessment of small mountain streams?

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 620, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 135-147

  Gillett, Nadezhda ^a   Pan, Yangdong ^a   Parker, Christian ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioassessment; Headwater streams; Live diatoms; Multivariate analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; LANDFORMS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; PHYTOPLANKTON;

ACCURACY AND PRECISIONS; BENTHIC DIATOMS; BIOASSESSMENT; CANOPY COVERS; CHANNEL DIMENSIONS; CONVENTIONAL METHODS; DIATOM ASSEMBLAGES; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; HEADWATER STREAMS; LIVE DIATOMS; MOUNTAIN STREAMS; MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL HABITATS; STREAM SITES; SUBSTRATE TYPES;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

BIOASSAY; DIATOM; HEADWATER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMY;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

BACILLARIOPHYTA;

EID: 58149181537     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9624-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AJ Alverson KM Manoylov RJ Stevenson 2003 Laboratory sources of error for algal community attributes during sample preparation and counting Journal of Applied Phycology 15 357 369
2. LE Barnese RL Lowe 1992 Effects of substrate, light, and benthic invertebrates on algal drift in small streams Journal of the North American Benthological Society 11 49 59
3. Y Cao CP Hawkins J Olson MA Kosterman 2007 Modeling natural environmental gradients improves the accuracy and precision of diatom-based indicators Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26 566 585
4. Charles, D. F., C. Knowles & R. S. Davis, 2002. Protocols for the analysis of algal samples collected as part of the U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Report No. 02-06, Patrick Center for Environmental Research, The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA. http://diatom.acnatsci.org/nawqa/.
5. B Chessman I Growns J Curray N Plunkett-Cole 1999 Predicting diatom communities at the genus level for the rapid biological assessment of rivers Freshwater Biology 41 317 331
6. CLAMS (Coastal landscape analysis and modeling study), 1996. http://www.fsl.orst.edu/clams/data_index.html.
7. KR Clarke 1993 Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure Australian Journal of Ecology 18 117 143
8. SE Clarke D White AL Schaedel 1991 Oregon, USA, Ecological regions and subregions for water quality management Environmental Management 15 847 856
9. Clesceri, L. S., A. E. Greenberg & A. D. Eaton, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
10. Cox, E. J., 1996. Identification of Freshwater Diatoms from Live Material. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
11. Cox, E. J., 1998. A rationale and some suggestions for developing rapid biomonitoring techniques using identification of live diatoms. In Proceedings of the 15th International Diatom Symposium: 43-50.
12. Gower, J. C., 1971. Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In Hodson, F. R., D. G. Kendall & P. Tautu (eds), Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh: 138-149.
13. GS Hassan MA Espinosa FI Isla 2008 Fidelity of dead diatom assemblages in estuarine sediments: how much environmental information is preserved? Palaios 23 112 120
14. CP Hawkins 2006 Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments Ecological Applications 16 1277 1294
15. DA Jackson 1995 PROTEST: a PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance Ecoscience 2 297 303
16. Jackson, P. L. & A. J. Kimerling, 1993. Atlas of the Pacific Northwest. OSU Press, Corvallis, OR.
17. Kaufmann, P. R, P. Levine, E. G. Robison, C. Seeliger & D. V. Peck, 1999. Quantifying Physical Habitat in Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-99/003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
18. M Kelly 2001 Use of similarity measures for quality control of benthic diatom samples Water Resources 35 2784 2788
19. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1997a. Bacillariophyceae. Naviculaceae. In Ettl, J., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2/1. Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin: 1-876.
20. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1997b. Bacillariophyceae. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In Ettl, J., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2/2. Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin: 1-610.
21. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 2000. Bacillariophyceae. Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In Ettl, J., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2/3. Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin: 1-598.
22. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 2004. Bacillariophyceae. Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Achnanthes s. l., Navicula s. str., Gomphonema. In Ettl, J., J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa, 2/4. Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin: 1-468.
23. Lazorchak, J. M., D. J. Klemm & D. V. Peck, 1998. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program - Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
24. Naiman, R. J. & R. E. Bilby, 1998. River ecology and management in the Pacific Coastal ecoregion. In Naiman, R. J. & R. E. Bilby (eds), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal ecoregion. Springer-Verlag, New York: 1-10.
25. Oksanen, J., R. Kindt, P. Legendre, B. O'Hara, G. L. Simpson & M. H. H. Stevens 2008. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.11-2. http://cran.r-project.org/, http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/.
26. JM Omernik 1987 Map supplement: ecoregions of the conterminous United States Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 118 125
27. DR Oppenheim 1987 Frequency distribution studies of epipelic diatoms along an intertidal shore Helgoland Marine Research 41 139 148
28. Owen, B. B., M. Afzal & W. R. Cody, 1979. Distinguishing between live and dead diatoms in periphyton communities. In Wetzel, R. L. (ed.), Methods and Measurements of Periphyton Communities: A Review. American Society for Testing and Materials, STP 690: 70-76.
29. Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1966. The Diatoms of the United States, Vol. 1. Monograph #13 of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
30. Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1975. The Diatoms of the United States, Vol. 2. Monograph #13 of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
31. R Patrick MH Hohn JH Wallace 1954 A new method for determining the pattern of the diatom flora Notulae Naturae of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 259 1 12
32. PR Peres-Neto DA Jackson 2001 How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test Oecologia 129 169 178
33. CG Peterson 1996 Mechanisms of lotic microalgal colonization following space-clearing disturbances acting at different spatial scales Oikos 77 417 435
34. MG Potapova DF Charles 2005 Choice of substrate in algae-based water quality assessment Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24 415 427
35. Pryfogle, P. A., 1975. Seasonal distribution of periphytic diatom communities of Tymochtee Creek. In Proceedings of the Sandusky River Basin Symposium. International Joint Commission Canada-U.S.A. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement 1972: 153-173.
36. Pryfogle, P. A. & R. L. Lowe, 1979. Sampling and interpretation of epilithic lotic diatom communities. In Wetzel, R. L. (ed.), Methods and Measurements of Periphyton Communities: A Review. American Society for Testing and Materials, STP 690: 77-89.
37. J Prygiel P Carpentier S Almeida M Coste J-C Druart L Ector D Guillard M-A Honoré R Iserentant P Ledeganck C Lalanne-Cassou C Lesniak I Mercier P Moncaut M Nazart N Nouchet F Peres V Peeters F Rimet A Rumeau S Sabater F Straub M Torrisi L Tudesque BV de Vijver H Vidal J Vizinet N Zydek 2002 Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercomparison exercise Journal of Applied Phycology 14 27 39
38. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
39. FE Round 1998 A problem in algal ecology: contamination of habitats from adjacent communities Cryptogamie Algologie 19 49 55
40. Y Sawai 2001 Distribution of living and dead diatoms in tidal wetlands of northern Japan: relations to taphonomy Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 173 125 141
41. Stevenson, R. J. & Y. Pan, 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In Stoermer, E. F. & J. P. Smol (eds), The Diatoms Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York: 11-40.
42. DP Thomas 1979 Some problems connected with the use of cleared cells and relative proportions of species in diatom ecology Beiheft für Nova Hedwigia 64 503 511
43. US EPA, 1983. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
44. Venables, W. N. & B. D. Ripley, 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. Springer, New York.
45. Walker, G. W. & N. S. MacLeod, 1991. Geologic map of Oregon. US Geological Survey, Scale 1:500,000. http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/docs/geologic/or/ oregon.html.
46. CL Weilhoefer Y Pan 2007 A comparison of periphyton assemblages generated by two sampling protocols Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26 308 318
47. CJ Wilson RW Holmes 1981 The ecological importance of distinguishing between living and dead diatoms in estuarine sediments European Journal of Phycology 16 345 349