Gauging the intensity of criminal sanctions: Developing the criminal punishment severity scale (CPSS)

Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 175-206

  Schiff, Mara F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149175890     PISSN: 07340168     EISSN: 15563839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073401689702200204     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alpert, G., & Apospori, E. (1993). Research note: The role of differential experience with the criminal justice system in changes in perceptions of severity of legal sanctions over time. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 184-194.
2. Ashworth, A. (1993). Some doubts about restorative justice. Criminal Law Forum, 4(2), 277-304.
3. Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (1996). Community justice/restorative justice: Prospects for a new social ecology for community corrections. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 20(2), 311-335.
4. Bottoms, A. (1994). Avoiding injustice, promoting legitimacy and relationships. In J. Burnside & N. Baker (Eds.), Relational justice: Repairing the breach (pp. 53-68). Cambridge, England: Waterside Press.
5. Braithwaite, J., & Pettit, P. (1990). Not just deserts: A republican theory of justice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6. Buchner, D. (1979). Scale of sentence severity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 182-187.
7. Cragg, W. (1992). The practice of punishment: Towards a theory of restorative justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Crouch, B. (1993). Is incarceration really worse? Analysis of offenders' preferences for prison over probation. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 67-88.
9. DuPont, P. (1986). A governor's perspective on sentencing. In P. B. McGuigan & J. S. Pasquale (Eds.), Crime and punishment in modern America (pp. 320-321). Washington, DC: Free Congress and Research Foundation.
10. Erickson, M., & Gibbs, J. (1979). On the perceived severity of legal penalties. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 102-116.
11. Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to others. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Harlow, R. E., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (1995). The severity of intermediate penal sanctions: A psychophysical scaling approach for obtaining community perceptions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11(1), 71-95.
13. Hillsman, S., & Greene, J. (1987). Improving the use and administration of criminal fines. New York, NY: The Vera Institute.
14. King, N. J. (1995). Portioning punishment: Constitutional limits on successive and excessive penalties. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144(1), 101-196.
15. Morris, N. (1976). The future of imprisonment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1994). What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison v. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, 58(1), 3-8.
18. Petersilia, J., & Deschenes, E. P. (1995). Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions. The Prison Journal, 74(3), 306-328.
19. Robinson, P. (1987a). Hybrid principles for the distribution of criminal sanctions. Northwestern University Law Review, 19, 34-36.
20. Robinson, P. (1987b). A sentencing system for the 21st century?Texas Law Review, 66, 1-61.
21. Sebba, L. (1978). Some explorations in the scaling of penalties. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 15, 247-265.
22. Sebba, L., & Nathan, G. (1984). Further explorations in the scaling of penalties. British Journal of Criminology, 23, 221-249.
23. Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. Spelman, W. (1995). The severity of intermediate sanctions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(2), 107-135.
25. Van Ness, D. (1993). New wine and old wineskins: Four challenges of restorative justice. Criminal Law Forum, 4(2), 251-306.
26. Van Ness, D. W. (in press). Legal principles and process. In L. Walgrave & G. Bazemore (Eds.), Restoring juvenile justice: An exploration of the restorative justice paradigm for juvenile offenders. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.
27. Van Ness, D., & Strong, K. H. (1997). Restoring justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
28. von Hirsch, A. (1985). Past or future crimes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29. von Hirsch, A. (1992). Scaling intermediate punishments: A comparison of two models. In J. M. Byme, A. J. Lurigio, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 211-228). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. von Hirsch, A. (1993). Censure and sanctions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31. von Hirsch, A. (in press). Penal philosophy: How much to punish. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice handbook. Oxford, England: Oxford Press.
32. von Hirsch, A., & Jareborg, N. (1991). Gauging criminal harm: A living-standard analysis. Oxford University Journal of Legal Studies, 11, 1-38.
33. von Hirsch, A., Wasik, M., & Greene, J. (1989). Punishments in the community and the principles of desert. Rutgers Law Review, 20, 595-618.
34. Walgrave, L. (in press). Community service as a cornerstone within a fully fledged restorative public response to juvenile crime. In L. Walgrave & G. Bazemore (Eds.), Restoring juvenile justice: An exploration of the restorative justice paradigm for juvenile offenders. Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.
35. Webster's Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. (1989). New York, NY: Portland House.
36. Zimring, F. (1987). Principles of sentencing, plain and fancy. Northwestern University Law Review, 82, 73-78.