Developing the protocol for the evaluation of the health foundation's 'engaging with quality initiative' - An emergent approach

Implementation Science

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Soper, Bryony ^a   Buxton, Martin ^a   Hanney, Stephen ^a   Oortwijn, Wija ^b   Scoggins, Amanda ^c   Steel, Nick ^d,e   Ling, Tom ^c  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b ECORYS Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^e NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58149166465     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-46     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. EA McGlynn SM Asch J Adams J Keesey J Hicks A DeCristofaro, N Engl J Med 2003 348 26 2635 2645 10.1056/NEJMsa022615 12826639
2. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand. ME Seddon MN Marshall SM Campbell MO Roland, Quality in health care 2001 10 152 8 11533422 10.1136/qhc.0100152.
3. Assuring the Quality of Medical Practice. Implementing Supporting doctors protecting patients. Department of Health, London; Department of Health 2001
4. S Leatherman K Sutherland, The Quest for Quality in the NHS: A mid-term evaluation of the ten year quality agenda The Nuffield Trust: TSO 2003
5. Report on the 'Breakthrough' Collaborative approach to quality and service improvement within four regions of the NHS. SP Bate G Robert H McLeod, Research Report No. 42 Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham 2002
6. The NHS Plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. Department of Health, Leeds: Department of Health 2000
7. The NHS Improvement Plan. Department of Health, London; Department of Health 2004
8. High Quality Care for All. Department of Health, London; Department of Health 2008
9. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. M Campbell R Fitzpatrick A Haines AL Kinmonth P Sandercock D Spiegelhalter, BMJ 2000 321 694 6 10987780 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694
10. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. N Campbell E Murray J Darbyshire J Emerey A Farmer F Griffiths, BMJ 2007 334 455 459 17332585 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE
11. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. J Grimshaw R Thomas G MacLennan C Fraser C Ramsay L Vale, Health Technology Assessment 2004 8 6 14960256
12. Changing Provider Behaviour. An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. JM Grimshaw L Shirran R Thomas G Mowatt C Fraser L Bero, Med Care 2001 39 8 Suppl 2 II2 II45 II ? 2 ? 1145 11583120
13. R Pawson N Tilley, Realistic Evaluation London: Sage Publications 1997
14. The Science of Improvement. D Berwick, JAMA 2008 299 10 1182 4 10.1001/jama.299.10.1182 18334694
15. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. D Berwick, Qual Saf Health Care 2005 14 315 6 16195561 10.1136/qshc.2005.015669
16. The Health Foundation Engaging with Quality Initiative. http://www.health.org.uk/current-work/demonstration-projects/ewq.html#chapter2
17. The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry: Final Report. http://www.bristol- inquiry.org.uk/final-report/index.htm
18. stCentury. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press Washington, D.C 2001
19. Principles for best practice in clinical audit. NICE, Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon 2002
20. Implementing clinical governance: turning vision into reality. L Donaldson A Halligan, BMJ 2001 322 1413 1417 11397753 10.1136/bmj.322.7299.1413
21. Developing team working in health care: a guide for managers. C Borrill M West, Aston: Aston Centre for Health Service Organisation Research, Aston University 2001
22. An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice. J Rycroft-Malone G Harvey K Seers A Fitson B McCormack A Titchen, J Clin Nursing 2004 13 8 913 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x
23. Getting Research into Practice: the case of Glue Ear. S Dopson S Dawson R Millar K Sutherland, Quality in Healthcare 1999 8 2 108 118
24. Assessing benefits from Department of Health and NHS R&D. M Buxton S Hanney T Packwood S Roberts P Youll, Public Money Manag 2000 20 29 34 10.1111/1467-9302.00233
25. Using Realistic Evaluation to Evaluate a Practice-level Intervention to Improve Primary Healthcare for Patients with Long-term Mental Illness. R Byng I Norman S Redfern, Evaluation 2005 11 69 10.1177/1356389005053198
26. Evidence-based Quality Improvement: The State of The Science. K Shojanla J Grimshaw, Health Affairs 2005
27. Tools to support service improvement and redesign. NHS Scotland, A Guide to Service Improvement Scottish Executive 2005 45 50
28. Department of Health, Report of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees. London 2005
29. The Ethics of Using Methods to Improve Health Care Quality and Safety. M Baily M Bottrell J Lynn B Jennings, Hastings Center Special Report 2006
30. Differentiating audit, service evaluation and research. http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/news-and-publications/publications/ nres-research-leaflets/
31. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America Institute of Medicine L Kohn J Corrigan M Donaldson Eds, National Academy Press Washington, D.C 1999
32. Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm
33. MRC position statement on research regulation and ethics. http://pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/pdf/links/Researchregulationandethics.pdf
34. United Bristol Healthcare Trust. How to apply ethics to clinical audit. http://www.uhbristol.nhs.uk/ Please add the following to the home page link to reach requested pfd: documents/what-is-ca.pdf
35. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research-memoranda/RM5888/