Developing patient information sheets in general practice. Method proposal;Élaboration de fiches d'information pour les patients en médecine générale: Proposition d'une méthodologie

Revue du Praticien

Volumn 58, Issue 19 SUPPL., 2008, Pages 17-24

  Sustersic, Mélanie ^a   Meneau, Aurélia ^a   Drémont, Roger ^a   Paris, Adeline ^a   Laborde, Laurent ^a   Bosson, Jean Luc ^a  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN; VALIDATION PROCESS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STANDARD;

FAMILY PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 58149157458     PISSN: 00352640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Lauh S. Information des patients en psychiatrie sur les médicaments psychotropes. Thèse pour le doctorat en médecine. Faculté de Grenoble, 2006.
2. IDS France, Médecins/pharmaciens et l'information santé, TNS Sofres, mars 2003.
3. Ziegler DK, Mosier MC, Buenaver M, Okuyemi. How much information about adverse effects of medication do patients want from physicians? Arch Intern Med 2001;161:706-13.
4. Nair K, Dolovitch L, Cessels A, et al. What patients want to know about their medications. Focus group study of patient and clinician perspectives. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:104-10.
5. Shank JC, Murphy M, Schulte-Mowry L. Patient preferences regarding educational pamphlets in the family practice center. Fam Med 1991;23:429-32.
6. Kenny T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, et al. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract 1998;15:471-9.
7. Code de déontologie médicale. Figurant dans le code de la santé publigue sous le NOR.4127-1 à 112, décret d'application no 95-1000, 6 septembre 1995.
8. e édition. Paris: Dalloz éd., 2006.
9. Agence nationale d'accréditation et d'évaluation en santé. Information des patients: recommandations destinées aux médecins. Paris : Anaes, 2000.
10. Little P, Dorward M, Warner G, et al. Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care. BMJ 2004;328:441-4.
11. Little P, Griffin S, Kelly J, Dickson N, Sadler C. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1998;316:1948-52.
12. Collings CH, Pike LC, Binder AI, McClymont ME, Knight ST. Value of written health information in the general practice setting. Br J Gen Pract 1991;352:466-7.
13. Dunkelman H. Patients knowledge of their condition and treatment, how it might be improved. Br Med J 1979;2:311-4.
14. Wilkinson P, Tylden-Pattenson L, Gould J, Wood P. Comparative assessment of two booklets about rheumatoid arthritis intended for use by patients. Health Educ J 1981;40:84-8.
15. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Love MM, Evans ME, Finger R. An evaluation of statewide strategies to reduce antibiotic overuse. Fam Med 2000;32:22-9.
16. Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R. Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ 2002;324:91-4.
17. Fox S. Online Health Search 2006. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project, octobre 2006.
18. Informations de santé sur Internet. DGS, avril 1989, réactualisation 1999. www.sante.gouv.fr
19. How to present the evidence for consumers: preparation of consumer publications. Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines Endorsed. National Health and Medical Research Council, novembre 1999.
20. Élaboration d'un document écrit d'information à l'intention des patients et des usagers du système de santé, guide méthodologique. HAS/Service des recommandations professionnelles, mars 2005. www.has-sante.fr
21. De bons remèdes pour les aînés : lignes directrices sur la rédaction des documents et la conception des emballages des médicaments sur ordonnance. Association canadienne de santé publique, 2002. www.nlhp.cpha.ca
22. Dickinson D, Raynor DK, Duman M. Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design. Patient Educ Couns 2001;43:147-59.
23. Moumjid N, Morelle M, Carrere MO, Bachelot T, Mignotte H, Bremond A. Elaborating patient information with patients themselves: lessons from a cancer treatment focus group. Health Expec 2003;6:128-39.
24. Inpes. Grille d'analyse des outils d'intervention en éducation pour la santé et questionnaire d'évaluation. Paris : Direction des affaires scientifiques, 2005.
25. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 1999;318:318-22.
26. Secker J. Assessing the quality of patient-education leaflets. Coronary Health Care 1997;1:37-41.
27. Richaudeau F. Écrire avec efficacité. Paris, Albin Michel éd., 1992.
28. Kitching JB. Patient information leaflets - the state of the art. J R Soc Med 1990;83:298-300.
29. Clerehan R, Buchbinder R, Moodie J. A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Educ Res 2005;20:334-44.
30. Recommandations et pratique: 100 stratégies pour la pratique clinique. Paris, Vidal, 2005.
31. How to present the evidence for consumers: preparation of consumer publications. Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines. National Health and Medical Research Council, novembre 1999.
32. Bernadini C, Ambrogi V, Fardella G, Perioli L, Grandolini G. How to improve the readability of the patient package leaflet: a survey on the use of colour, print size and layout. Pharmacological Research 2001;43:437-44.
33. Krass I, Svarstad BL, Bultman D. Using alternative methodologies for evaluating patient medication leaflets Patient Educ Couns 2002;47:29-35.
34. Mesnager J. Pour une étude de la difficulté des textes : la lisibilité revisitée. Le Français aujourd'hui 2002;137.
35. Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioners computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ 1995;311:848-52.
36. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Heynes B, Mathieu A. Effects of computer based clinical decision support systems on clinical performance and patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:135-42.
37. Weinman J. Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations. J R Soc Med 1990;83:303-5.
38. Paris A, Nogueira da Gama Chaves D, Cornu C, et al. Improvement of the comprehension of written information given to healthy volunteers in biomedical research: a single-blind randomised controlled study. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007;21:207-14.
39. Holmes-Rovner M, Stableford S, Fagerlin A, et al. Evidence-based patient choice: a prostate cancer decision aid in plain langage. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak 2005;5:16.
40. Roland M, Dixon M. Randomised controlled trial of an educational booklet for patients presenting with back pain in general practice. J R Coll Gen Prac 1989;39:244-6.
41. Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S, et al. Validity of the Agency for healthcare research and guality clinical practice guidelines: How quickly do guidelines become outdated? JAMA 2001;286:1461-7.
42. Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J, et al. Limited (information only) patient education programs for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;CD001005.
43. St-Amour M, Guay M, Peron L, et al. Are vaccination information leaflets useful for vaccinators and parents? Vaccine 2006:2491-6.
44. Référence danoise citée dans l'article «A PIL for every ill» (V. réf. 17).