Distributional stress regularity: A corpus study

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-92

  Temperley, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Corpus analysis; Prosody; Stress; Syntactic choice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

HUMANS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT;

EID: 58149154697     PISSN: 00906905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-008-9084-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abercrombie D. (1967) Elements of general phonetics. Aldine, Chicago
2. Beckman, M. E., Swora, M. G., Rauschenberg, J., & de Jong, K. (1990). Stress shift, stress clash, and polysyllabic shortening in a prosodically annotated discourse. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 5-8).
3. Bolinger D. (1965) Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
4. Cann R. (2001) Functional versus lexical: A cognitive dichotomy. In: Borsley R.D.(eds) The nature and function of syntactic categories. Academic Press, New York, pp 37-78
5. Chomsky N., Halle M. (1968) The sound pattern of English. Harper and Row, New York
6. W.E. Cooper S.J. Eady 1986 Metrical phonology in speech production Journal of Memory and Language 25 369 384
7. Cruttenden A. (1997) Intonation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
8. R.M. Dauer 1983 Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed Journal of Phonetics 11 51 62
9. J. Elsness 1984 That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English English Studies 65 519 533
10. V.S. Ferreira G.S. Dell 2000 Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production Cognitive Psychology 40 296 340
11. D.B. Fry 1958 Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1 126 152
12. Greenberg, S. (1997). The Switchboard Transcription Project. 1996 Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition Summer Research Workshop Technical Report Series, Research Report #24. Baltimore, MD: Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University.
13. Haveman, A. P. (1996). Effects of frequency on the auditory perception of open- versus closed-class words. InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 78-81).
14. B. Hayes 1984 The phonology of rhythm in English Linguistic Inquiry 15 33 74
15. Hayes B. (1995) Metrical stress theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
16. Hitchcock, L., & Greenberg, S. (2001). Vowel height is intimately associated with stress accent in spontaneous American English discourse. In EUROSPEECH-2001 (pp. 79-82).
17. Jaeger, T. F., & Wasow, T. (2005). Processing as a source of accessibility effects on variation. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
18. M.H. Kelly J.K. Bock 1988 Stress in time Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14 389 403
19. Ladefoged P. (1993) A course in phonetics. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth
20. M. Lee J. Gibbons 2007 Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: New evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding Cognition 105 446 456
21. I. Lehiste 1972 The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 2018 2024
22. M. Liberman A. Prince 1977 On stress and linguistic rhythm Linguistic Inquiry 8 249 336
23. J.G. Martin 1970 Rhythm-induced judgments of word stress in sentences Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9 627 633
24. J.L. McDonald K. Bock M.H. Kelly 1993 Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position Cognitive Psychology 25 188 230
25. J. Morton W. Jassem 1965 Acoustical correlates of stress Language and Speech 8 159 181
26. M. Nespor I. Vogel 1989 On clashes and lapses Phonology 6 69 116
27. Ostendorf, M., Price, P. J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1995). The Boston University Radio News Corpus. Boston University Technical Report No. ECS-95-001.
28. Pike K. (1945) The intonation of American English. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
29. Radford A. (1997) Syntactic theory and the structure of English. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
30. Roach P. (1982) On the distinction between 'stress-timed' and 'syllable-timed' languages. In: David Crystal(eds) Linguistic controversies. Edward Arnold, London, pp 73-79
31. Selkirk E. (1984) Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press, Cambridge
32. Selkirk E. (1996) The prosodic structure of function words. In: Morgan J.L., Demuth K.(eds) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 187-213
33. A.M.C. Sluijter V.J. van Heuven 1996 Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 2471 2485
34. D. Temperley 2003 Ambiguity avoidance in English relative clauses Language 79 464 484
35. Wagner, P. S. (2000). Evaluating metrical phonology-a computational-empirical approach. In Proceedings of KONVENS (Konferenz zur Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache) (pp. 243-248).