A model for structuring the donor discussion in emergent transplant procedures

Progress in Transplantation

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 157-161

  Clarke, Alex ^a   Malloy, Jonathan ^a   White, Paul ^b   Simmons, Jon ^a   Gwanmesia, Ivo ^a   Withey, Simon ^a   Butler, Peter E M ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR; DONOR; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTENTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 58149145537     PISSN: 15269248     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/152692480801800302     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barber K, Falvey S, Hamilton C, et al. Potential for organ donation in the UK: Audit of intensive care records. BMJ. 2006;332:1124.
2. International figures on organ donation and transplantation. Council of Europe Transplant Newsletter 2005;10(1):1. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/health/ Source/2005transplantNWSLTTR-en.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2008.
3. Ohler L. Donor family perspectives: What we learn from teaching families. Prog Transplant. 2007;17(3):174-175. (Pubitemid 47435762)
4. Verble M, Worth J. Reservations and preferences among procurement professionals concerning the donation of specific organs and tissues. J Transplant Coord. 1997;7:111-115. (Pubitemid 28122082)
5. Verble M, Worth J. Biases among hospital personnel concerning donation of specific organs and tissues: Implications for the donation discussion and education. J Transplant Coord. 1997;7:72-77. (Pubitemid 27368063)
6. Sanner M. A comparison of public attitudes toward autopsy, organ donation, and anatomic dissection: A Swedish survey. JAMA. 1994;271(4):284-288. (Pubitemid 24030755)
7. Verble M, Bowen GR, Kay N, Mitoff J, Shafer TJ, Worth J, et al. A multiethnic study of the relationship between fears and concerns and refusal rates. Prog Transplant. 2002;12:185-190. (Pubitemid 35025771)
8. Sanner MA. A Swedish survey of young people's views on organ donation and transplantation. Transpl Int. 2002;15:641-8. (Pubitemid 36068180)
9. Verble M, Worth J. Dealing with the fear of mutilation in the donation discussion. J Transplant Coord. 1999;9:54-56. (Pubitemid 29158679)
10. Verble M, Worth J. Fears and concerns expressed by families in the donation discussion. Prog Transplant. 2000;10:48-55. (Pubitemid 30616593)
11. Clarke A, Simmons J, White P, Withey S, Butler, PEM. Attitudes to face transplantation: Results of a public engagement exercise at the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition. J Burn Care Rehab. 2006;27(3):394-398. (Pubitemid 43970308)
12. Clarke A, Murphy F, Brough V, Renshaw A, Butler PEM. Attitudes to facial transplantation of transplant professionals in the UK. Prog Transplant. 2007;17:228-233. (Pubitemid 47435771)
13. Practice guidelines for transplant coordinators. http://www .uktransplant.org.uk/ukt/about-transplants/donor-care/policy-documents/ standards-for-DTCs.doc. Accessed August 6, 2008.
14. Devauchelle B, Badet L, Lengel B, et al. First human face allograft: Early report. Lancet. 2006;368:203-209. (Pubitemid 44037773)
15. Macartney J. Face transplant for bear attack victim. The Times. April 15, 2006:9.
16. Guttman L. A basis for scaling qualitative data. Am Soc Rev. 1944;9:139-150.
17. De Souza LH. The development of a scale of the Guttman type for the assessment of mobility disability in multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehab. 1999;13(6):476-481.
18. Torgerson WS. Theory and Methods of Scaling. New York, NY: Wiley; 1958.
19. Menzel H. A new coefficient for scalogram analysis. Pub Opin Q. 1953;17:141.
20. Knol DL, Berger MP. Empirical comparison between factor analysis and multidimensional item response models. Multivariate Behav Res. 1991;26:457-477.
21. Parry CD, McArdle JJ. An applied comparison of methods for least-squares factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Appl Psychol Measure. 1991;15:35-46.
22. Renshaw A, Choonea T, Clarke A, Butler PE. An artificial prosthesis to reconstruct donor defects following facial transplantation. ClinTransplant. 2007;21:574-576. (Pubitemid 47161839)