Validation of an off-eye contact lens shack-hartmann wavefront aberrometer

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2008, Pages E817-E828

  Kollbaum, Pete ^a   Jansen, Meredith ^a   Thibos, Larry ^a   Bradley, Arthur ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aberration; Accuracy; Contact lens; Repeatability; Validity; Wavefront

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BEFORE AND AFTER; EX-VIVO; EXPECTED VALUES; FOURTH-ORDER; HIGHER ORDER; INDEPENDENT MEASUREMENT; LENS ABERRATION; LENS DESIGNS; LONGITUDINAL SPHERICAL ABERRATION; OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS; OPTICAL THEORY; POWER MEASUREMENT; REPEATABILITY; REPEATED MEASUREMENTS; SECOND-ORDER ABERRATIONS; SHACK-HARTMANN; SHACK-HARTMANN WAVEFRONT; SINGLE PASS; SPECTACLE LENS; SPHERICAL ABERRATIONS; THIRD-ORDER ABERRATION; VALIDITY;

ABERRATIONS; CELL MEMBRANES; CONTACT LENSES; WAVEFRONTS;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENTS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHACK HARTMANN ABERROMETER; SPECTACLES; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; THEORY; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT RELATED PHENOMENA; OPTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

CONTACT LENSES; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; OPTICAL PROCESSES; OPTOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 58149139534     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: 15389235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318185280e     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Plainis S, Charman WN. On-eye power characteristics of soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:44-54.
2. Bauer GT, Lechner HB. Measurement of the longitudinal spherical aberration of soft contact lenses. Opt Lett 1979;4:224-6.
3. BenjaminWJ. Optical phenomena of contact lenses. In: Bennett ES, Weissman BA, eds. Clinical Contact Lens Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:111-64.
4. Westheimer G. Aberrations of contact lenses. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1961;38:445-8.
5. Lopez-Gil N, Castejon-Mochon JF, Benito A, Marin JM, Lo-a-Foe G, Marin G, Fermigier B, Renard D, Joyeux D, Chateau N, Artal P. Aberration generation by contact lenses with aspheric and asymmetric surfaces. J Refract Surg 2002;18:S603-9.
6. Jeong TM, Menon M, Yoon G. Measurement of wave-front aberration in soft contact lenses by use of a Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor. Appl Opt 2005;44:4523-7.
7. Benjamin WJ. Applied optics of contact lens corrections. In: Benjamin WJ, Borish IM, eds. Borish’s Clinical Refraction, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2006:1188-245.
8. Campbell C. Converting wet cell measured soft lens power to vertex power in air. Int Contact Lens Clin 1984;11:168-71.
9. Copland J. ClearWave Aberrometer: Instrument Theory of Operations. Albuquerque: AMO-Wavefront Sciences; 2007.
10. Fatt I, Chaston J. The effect of temperature on refractive index, water content, and central thickness of hydrogel contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980;7:250-5.
11. Nichols JJ, Berntsen DA. The assessment of automated measures of hydrogel contact lens refractive index. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003;23:517-25.
12. International Standards Organization. ISO 9342-2:2005: Optics and Optical Instruments: Test Lenses for Calibration of Focimeters. Part 2. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization; 2005.
13. Clement MKT, Hayden JS, Hayden YT, Hoffmann HJ, Lentes FT, Neuroth N. Optical properties. In: Bach H, Neuroth N, eds. The Properties of Optical Glass. Berlin: Springer; 1998:19-66.
14. Cox I. Theoretical calculation of the longitudinal spherical aberration of rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:277-82.
15. Guirao A, Williams DR, Cox IG. Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye’s higher-order aberrations. J Opt Soc Am A 2001;18:1003-15.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
17. Cheng X, Himebaugh NL, Kollbaum PS, Thibos LN, Bradley A. Validation of a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:587-95.
18. Thibos LN, Cheng X, Bradley A. Design principles and limitations of wave-front guided contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S167-70.
19. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. On- and off-eye spherical aberration of soft contact lenses and consequent changes of effective lens power. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:126-34.
20. Payor RE, Robirds SR, Zhang X, Schwallie JD. Soft toric lens power accuracy and reproducibility. CLAO J 1995;21:163-8.
21. Seibel EJ, Trilsch WR, Lee D. Evaluating soft contact lens quality: a manufacturer’s perspective. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:298-307.
22. Efron N, Morgan P, Morgan S. Accuracy and reproducibility of one-day disposable contact lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:168-73.
23. Davies I. Soft toric contact lenses: a systematic approach to problem solving. Optician 1989;198:16-8.
24. Davies I. Fitting a spuncast soft toric contact lens. Optician 1991;201:36-41.
25. Adler P. Soft toric lens update. Trans BCLA 1990;13:33-6.
26. Ames KS, Erickson P, Medici L. Factors influencing hydrogel toric lens rotation. Int Contact Lens Clin 1989;16:221-5.
27. Douthwaite WA. Contact Lens Optics and Design, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995;257-61.