Frequency-dependent behavior of the intervertebral disc in response to each of six degree of freedom dynamic loading: Solid phase and fluid phase contributions

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1731-1738

  Costi, John J ^a,c,d   Stokes, Ian A ^a   Gardner Morse, MacK G ^a   Iatridis, James C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^b University of Vermont   (United States)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Frequency; Intervertebral disc; Poroelasticity; Six degree of freedom; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHATE BUFFERED SALINE; PROTEINASE INHIBITOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; FLUID FLOW; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MECHANICAL TORSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGIDITY; ROTATION; SOLID; TORQUE; VISCOELASTICITY; WEIGHT BEARING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELASTICITY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 58149133749     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bb116     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Huyghe JM, Houben GB, Drost MR, et al. An ionised/non-ionised dual porosity model of intervertebral disc tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2003;2:3-19.
2. Iatridis JC, Laible JP, Krag MH. Influence of fixed charge density magnitude and distribution on the intervertebral disc: applications of a poroelastic and chemical electric (PEACE) model. J Biomech Eng 2003; 125:12-24.
3. Hayes WC, Bodine AJ. Flow-independent viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage matrix. J Biomech 1978;11:407-19.
4. Mow VC, Huiskes R, eds. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Mechano-Biology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
5. Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, et al. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng 1980;102:73-84.
6. Mak AF. The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage-the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. J Biomech Eng 1986;108:123-30.
7. Woo SL, Peterson RH, Ohland KJ, et al. The effects of strain rate on the properties of the medial collateral ligament in skeletally immature and mature rabbits: a biomechanical and histological study. J Orthop Res 1990;8: 712-21.
8. Danto MI, Woo SL. The mechanical properties of skeletally mature rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon over a range of strain rates. J Orthop Res 1993;11:58-67.
9. Bonifasi-Lista C, Lake SP, Small MS, et al. Viscoelastic properties of the human medial collateral ligament under longitudinal, transverse and shear loading. J Orthop Res 2005;23:67-76.
10. Neumann P, Keller TS, Ekstrom L, et al. Effect of strain rate and bone mineral on the structural properties of the human anterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 1994;19:205-11.
11. Iatridis JC, Weidenbaum M, Setton LA, et al. Is the nucleus pulposus a solid or a fluid? Mechanical behaviors of the nucleus pulposus of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1996;21:1174-84.
12. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Weidenbaum M, et al. The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J Biomech 1997; 30:1005-13.
13. Leahy JC, Hukins DW. Viscoelastic properties of the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral disk in compression. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:689-92.
14. Ebara S, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, et al. Tensile properties of nondegenerate human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 1996;21:452-61.
15. Acaroglu ER, Iatridis JC, Setton LA, et al. Degeneration and aging affect the tensile behavior of human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 1995;20:2690-701.
16. Elliott DM, Setton LA. Anisotropic and inhomogeneous tensile behavior of the human anulus fibrosus: experimental measurement and material model predictions. J Biomech Eng 2001;123:256-63.
17. Galante JO. Tensile properties of the human lumbar annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 1967;(suppl 100):l-91.
18. Fujita Y, Duncan NA, Lotz JC. Radial tensile properties of the lumbar annulus fibrosus are site and degeneration dependent. J Orthop Res 1997;15: 814-9.
19. Holzapfel GA, Schulze-Bauer CA, Feigl G, et al. Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2005;3: 125-40.
20. Skaggs DL, Weidenbaum M, Iatridis JC, et al. Regional variation in tensile properties and biochemical composition of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Spine 1994;19:1310-9.
21. Race A, Broom ND, Robertson P. Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc. Spine 2000;25:662-9.
22. Nuckley DJ, Hertsted SM, Eck MP, et al. Effect of displacement rate on the tensile mechanics of pediatric cervical functional spinal units. J Biomech 2005;38:2266-75.
23. Elias PZ, Nuckley DJ, Ching RP. Effect of loading rate on the compressive mechanics of the immature baboon cervical spine. J Biomech Eng 2006;128: 18-23.
24. Yingling VR, Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Dynamic loading affects the mechanical properties and failure site of porcine spines. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1997;12:301-5.
25. Kemper AR, McNally C, Duma SM. The influence of strain rate on the compressive stiffness properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs. Biomed Sci Instrum 2007;43:176-81.
26. Koeller W, Meier W, Hartmann F. Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression. A comparison of lumbar and thoracic discs. Spine 1984;9:725-33.
27. Thompson JP, Pearce RH, Schechter MT, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 1990;15:411-5.
28. Nachemson AL, morris JM. In vivo measurements of intradiscal pressure. Discometry, a method for the determination of pressure in the lower lumbar discs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964;46:1077-92.
29. Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M, Churchill D, et al. Measurement of a spinal motion segment stiffness matrix. J Biomech 2002;35:517-21.
30. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999;24:755-62.
31. Nachemson A. Towards a better understanding of low-back pain: a review of the mechanics of the lumbar disc. Rheumatol Rehabil 1975;14:129-43.
32. Pflaster DS, Krag MH, Johnson CC, et al. Effect of test environment on intervertebral disc hydration. Spine 1997;22:133-9.
33. Hasberry S, Pearcy MJ. Temperature dependence of the tensile properties of interspinous ligaments of sheep. J Biomed Eng 1986;8:62-6.
34. Woo SL, Lee TQ, Gomez MA, et al. Temperature dependent behavior of the canine medial collateral ligament. J Biomech Eng 1987;109:68-71.
35. Lam TC, Thomas CG, Shrive NG, et al. The effects of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of the rabbit medial collateral ligament. J Biomech Eng 1990;112:147-52.
36. Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL. The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17:446-55.
37. Gardner-Morse MG, Stokes IA. Physiological axial compressive preloads increase motion segment stiffness, linearity and hysteresis in all six degrees of freedom for small displacements about the neutral posture. J Orthop Res 2003;21:547-52.