Evaluation of patient satisfaction with tailored online patient education information

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 258-264

  Atack, Lynda ^a,c   Luke, Robert ^b   Chien, Elise ^b  

^a Centennial College   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c Centennial College   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disease management; Educational technology; Health services research; Medical informatics; Needs assessment

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BREAST TUMOR; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK TUMOR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPREHENSION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 58149124102     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304838.52207.90     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gustafson D, Hawkins R, Boberg E, et al. Impact of a patient- centered computer-based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med. 1999;16:1-9.
2. Klein-Fedyshyn M, Burda M, Epstein B, Lawrence B. Collaborating to enhance patient education and recovery. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93:440-445.
3. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the Internet affects patients' experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;328:564.
4. Fox S. 2006. Online Health Search. The PEW Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP-Online- Health-2006.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2006.
5. Woodward C. Search engines clogged with commerce and begging for an upgrade. http://www.askquestions.org/articles/ searches/searchengines.pdf. Accessed September 13, 2006.
6. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285:2612-2621.
7. Hoffman T, Russell T, McKenna K. Producing computer-generated tailored written information for stroke patients and their carers: system development and preliminary evaluation. Int J Med Inform. 2004;73:751-758.
8. Kreuter MW, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailored Health Messages: Customizing Communication With Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1999.
9. Glasgow RE, Boles SM, McKay HG, Feil EG, Barrera JM. The D-Net Diabetes Self-management Program: long-term implemen-tation, outcomes, and generalization results. Prev Med. 2003;36: 410-419.
10. Turnin MC, Bourgeois O, Cathelineau G, et al. Multicenter randomized evaluation of a nutritional education software in obese patients. Diabetes Metab. 2001;27:139-147.
11. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, de Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition invention. Prev Med. 1996;25:236-242.
12. Dumas JS, Redish JC. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books; 1999:4.
13. Nielson J, Tahir M. Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders; 2002.
14. Lewis JR. Sample sizes for usability tests, mostly math not magic. Interactions. 2006;13(6):29-33.
15. Bevan N. Practical issues in usability measurement. Interactions. 2006;13(6):42-43.
16. Nahm E-S, Preece J, Resnick B, Mills ME. Usability of health Web sites for older adults: a preliminary study. Comput Nurs. 2004;22:326-334.
17. Benigeri M, Pluye P. Shortcomings of health information on the Internet. Health Promot Int. 2003;18:381-386.
18. Dickerson SS, Boehmke M, Ogle C, Brown JK. Seeking and managing hope: patients' experiences using the Internet for cancer care. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;33:8-17.
19. Balmer C. The information requirements of people with cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28:36-44.
20. Ream E, Richardson A. The role of information in patient's adaptation to chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a review of the literature. Eur J Cancer Care. 1996;5:132-128.
21. Smith CE, Puno F, Magee J, Bingham J, Van Gorp M. Quality assurance processes for designing patient education Websites. Comput Nurs. 2002;20:191-200.