Sampling design for compliance monitoring of surface water quality: A case study in a Polder area

Water Resources Research

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Brus, D J ^a   Knotters, M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; FARMS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PATIENT MONITORING; RANDOM PROCESSES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL TESTS; SURFACE WATER RESOURCES; SURFACE WATERS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

CASE STUDIES; COMPLIANCE MONITORING; DESIGNING EFFICIENT; EFFICIENT SAMPLINGS; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS; LEGAL STANDARDS; MODEL-BASED METHODS; NETHERLANDS; SAMPLING DESIGNS; SAMPLING PATTERNS; SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLINGS; SOUND MONITORING; SPACE AND TIMES; SPATIO TEMPORALS; SURFACE WATER QUALITIES; SYNCHRONOUS SAMPLINGS; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVES; WATER QUALITY STANDARDS;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; MONITORING SYSTEM; NITROGEN; SAMPLING; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE WATER; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 58149087216     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006123     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bloch, H. (2001), Policy on nutrients emission: Legislation and implementation, Water Sci. Technol., 44, 1-6.
2. Brus, D. J., and J. J. de Gruijter (1997), Random sampling or geostatistical modelling?: Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion), Geoderma, 80, 1-59.
3. Cochran, W. G. (1977), Sampling Techniques, 428 pp., Wiley, New York.
4. Commission of the European Communities (2002), Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection; COM (2002) 179 final report, 35 pp., Brussels.
5. Cooper, D. M. (2004), Some effects of sampling design on water quality estimation in streams, Hydrol. Sci., 49(6), 1055-1080.
6. Council of the European Communities (1992), Council directive 92/43/eec of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, Off. J. Eur. Communities, L206, 7-50.
7. Council of the European Communities (2000), Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, Off. J. Eur. Communities, L327, 1-72.
8. de Gruijter, J. J., D. J. Brus, M. F. P. Bierkens, and M. Knotters (2006), Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring, 332 pp., Springer, New York.
9. Harmancioglu, N. B., O. Fistikoglu, S. D. Ozkul, V. P. Singh, and M. N. Alpaslan (1999), Water Quality Monitoring Network Design, Water Sci Technol. Lib., vol. 33, 304 pp., Kluwer Acad., Dordrecht, Netherlands.
10. Overton, W. S., and S. V. Stehman (1996), Desirable design characteristics for long-term monitoring of ecological variables, Environ. Ecol. Stat., 3, 349-361.
11. Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946), An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics Bull., 2, 110-114.
12. United Nations (1992), United Nations Framework Directive Convention on Climate Change, 33 pp.
13. Water Framework Directive Common Implementation Strategy Working Group 2.7 Monitoring (2003), Guidance on monitoring for the Water Framework Directive, report, final version, 164 pp., 23 January.