Ontology-based multi-layered knowledge framework for product lifecycle management

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 301-311

  Lee, Jae Hyun ^a   Suh, Hyo Won ^b  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Knowledge framework; Knowledge management system; Ontology; Product lifecycle management

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE; MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGY;

A PROLOGS; ABSTRACTION LEVELS; CONTEXT MODELS; DO-MAINS; FIRST ORDER LOGICS; FORMAL DEFINITIONS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERS; KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE MAPS; KNOWLEDGE TYPES; LATTICE STRUCTURES; PRODUCT KNOWLEDGES; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLES; PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT MANUFACTURING; PRODUCT PLANNING; PROTOTYPE SYSTEMS; SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGES;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 58049199388     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: 15312003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X08100030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Syan, C.S. and Menon, U. (1994). Concurrent Engineering: Concepts, Implementation and Practice. Chapman & Hall, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
2. Court, A.W. (1998). Issues for Integrating Knowledge in New Product Development: Reflections from an Empirical Study, Knowledge Based System, 11: 391-398.
3. Kuffner, T.A. and Ullman, D.G. (1991). The Information Requests of Mechanical Design Engineers, Design Study, 12 (1): 42-50.
4. Stauffer, L.A. and Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental Process of Mechanical Designers Based on Empirical Data, J. Eng. Des., 2: 113-125.
5. Court, A.W. (1997). The Relationship Between Information and Personal Knowledge in New Product Development, Int. J. Inform. Manage., 17 (2): 123-138.
6. Vincenti, W.G. (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical Engineering, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
7. Mizoguchi, R., Tijerino, Y. and Ikeda, M. (1995). Task Analysis Interview Based on Task Ontology, Expert System with Applications, 9 (1): 15-25.
8. Heijst, G.V., Schreiber, A.Th. and Wielinga, B.J. (1997). Using Explicit Ontologies in KBS Development, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 45: 183-292.
9. Guarino, N. (1998) Formal Ontology and Information Systems, Proceedings of FOIS'98, Trento, Italy, 6-8 June 1998. Amsterdam, IOS Press, pp. 3-15.
10. Xue, D., Yadav, S. and Norrie, D.H. (1999). Knowledge Base and Database Representation for Intelligent Concurrent Design, Comput. Aided Des., 31 (2): 131-145.
11. Gorti, S.R. and Sriram, R.D. (1996). From Symbol to Form: A Framework for Conceptual Design, Comput. Aided Des., 28 (11): 853-870.
12. Gorti, S.R., Gupta, A., Kim, G.J. and Sriram, R.D. (1998). An Object-oriented Representation for Product and Design Processes, Comput. Aided Des., 30 (7): 489-501.
13. Roy, U., Pramanik, N., Sudarsan, R., Sriram, R.D. and Lyons, K.W. Function-to-form Mapping: Model, Representation and Applications in Design Synthesis, Comput. Aided Des., 33: 699-719.
14. Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S.J., Sriram, R.D., and Wang, F.A. (2005). Product Information Modeling Framework for Product Lifecycle Management, Comput. Aided Des., 37: 1399-1411.
15. Cutkosky, M.R., Engelmore, R.S., Fikes, R.E., Genesereth, M.R., Gruber, T.R., Mark, W.S., Tenenbaum, J.M. and Weber, J.C. (1993). PACT: An Experiment in Integrating Concurrent Engineering Systems, IEEE Computer Society, 26 (1): 28-37.
16. Kuokka, D.R., Mcguire, J.G., Pelavin, R.N. and Weber, J.C. (1994). SHADE: Technology for Knowledge-based Collaborative Engineering, In: AAAI Workshop on AI in Collaborative Design, 1994, pp. 245-262.
17. Borst, P. and Akkermans, H. (1997). Engineering Ontologies, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 46: 365-406.
18. Lin, J., Fox, M.S. and Bilgic, T. (1996). A Requirement Ontology for Engineering Design, Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 4 (3): 279-292.
19. Yoshioka, M. and Tomiyama, T. (1997). Pluggable Metamodel Mechanism: A Framework of an Integrated Design Object Modelling Environment, In: Proceedings of the 1997 Lancaster International Workshop on Engineering Design CACD'97, Lancaster University, pp. 57-70.
20. Kitamura, Y., Sano, T., Namba, K. and Mizoguchi, R. (2002). A Functional Concept Ontology and Its Application to Automatic Identification of Functional Structures, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 16 (2): 145-163.
21. Lee, J.H. and Suh, H.W. (2005). Ontology-based Multilevel Framework for the Knowledge Management System of Product Development, International Journal of CAD/CAM, 5 (1): N11.
22. Bozsak, E., Ehrig, M., Handschuh, S., Hotho, A., Maedche, A., Motik, B., Oberle, D., Schmitz, C., Staab, S. and Stojanovic, L. (2002). KAON-Towards a Large Scale Semantic Web, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2455: 304-313.
23. Heflin, J. (2004). OWL web ontology language use cases and requirements: W3C Recommended February, 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/webont-req/
24. Corcho, O. and Perez, A.G. (2000). A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1937: 80-96.
25. Russel, S. and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence, 2nd edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States, pp. 272-315.