Specifying and enforcing high-level semantic obligation policies

Web Semantics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 28-39

  Liu, Zhen ^a   Ranganathan, Anand ^a   Riabov, Anton ^a  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic workflow composition; High level events; Ontology; Policy; Semantic policy language

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; LINGUISTICS; MANAGEMENT; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS;

AUTOMATIC WORKFLOW COMPOSITION; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; EVENT PATTERNS; EVENT PROCESSING; EVENT SOURCES; EVENT STREAMS; GRAPH PATTERNS; HIGH-LEVEL EVENTS; MULTIMEDIA DATUMS; POLICY; POLICY ENFORCEMENTS; POLICY SPECIFICATION LANGUAGES; SEMANTIC POLICY LANGUAGE;

HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGES;

EID: 58049198098     PISSN: 15708268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2008.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. D. Abadi, et al., Aurora: a new model and architecture for data stream management, VLDB J.
2. S. Arasu, S. Babu, J. Widom, The CQL continuous query language: semantic foundations and query execution, Tech. Rep. TR-2003-67, Stanford University, 2003.
3. In: Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D.L., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P.F. (Eds). The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications (2003), Cambridge University Press
4. A. Bandara, E. Lupu, J. Moffet, A. Russo, A goal-based approach to policy refinement, in: Policy, 2004.
5. Becker M.Y., Fournet C., and Gordon A.D. Design and semantics of a decentralized authorization language. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium (2007)
6. D. Berardi, D. Calvanese, G.D. Giacomo, R. Hull, M. Mecella, Automatic composition of transition-based semantic web services with messaging, in: VLDB, 2005.
7. T. Berners-Lee, Notation 3, Tech. Rep., World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), 1998. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.
8. S. Chandrasekaran, et al., TelegraphCQ: continuous dataflow processing for an uncertain world, in: Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), 2003.
9. Cheng P.-C., Rohatgi P., Keser C., Karger P.A., Wagner G.M., and Reninger A.S. Fuzzy multi-level security: an experiment on quantified risk-adaptive access control. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2007)
10. M.C. Cont, F. Beato, On parametric obligation policies: enabling privacy-aware information lifecycle management in enterprises, in: Policy, 2004.
11. N. Damianou, N. Dulay, E. Lupu, M. Sloman, The ponder policy specification language, in: Policy, 2001.
12. de Bruijn, The Web Service Modeling Language WSML, http://www.wsmo.org/wsml/
13. Distributed Management Task Force, Common Information Model (CIM) Specification, version 2.2, 1999.
14. R. Ginis, R. Strom, An autonomic messaging middleware with stateful stream transformation, in: Proceedings of the ICAC'04, 2004.
15. B. Grosof, I. Horrocks, R. Volz, S. Decker, Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic, in: Proceedings of the WWW'03, 2003.
16. N. Jain, et al., Design, implementation, and evaluation of the linear road benchmark on the stream processing core, in: Proceedings of the SIGMOD'06, 2006.
17. L. Kagal, T. Finin, A. Josh, A policy language for a pervasive computing environment, in: Policy, 2003.
18. Li N., and Mitchell J. Rt: a role-based trust-management framework. Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (2003)
19. Liu Z., Ranganathan A., and Riabov A. Modeling web services using semantic graph transformations to aid automatic composition. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) (2007)
20. D. Martin, et al., OWL-S: semantic markup for web services, in: W3C Submission, 2004.
21. D. McGuinness, F. van Harmelen, OWL web ontology language overview, in: W3C Recommendation, 2004.
22. M.C. Mont, A. Baldwin, C. Goh, POWER Prototype: towards integrated policy-based management, Tech. Rep. HPL-1999-126, HP Laboratories Bristol.
23. B. Moore, J. Strassner, E. Ellesson, Policy core information model, IETF Internet draft.
24. S. Narayanan, S. McIlraith, Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services, in: WWW, 2002.
25. P. Hayes, Rdf semantics, in: W3C Recommendation, 2004.
26. E. Prud'hommeaux, A. Seaborne, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, in: W3C Working Draft, 2006.
27. A. Riabov, Z. Liu, Planning for stream processing systems, in: Proceedings of the AAAI'05, 2005.
28. M. Roy, Ibm semantic layered research platform, http://ibm-slrp.sourceforge.net/.
29. Sirin E., and Parsia B. Planning for semantic web services. Proceedings of the Semantic Web Services Workshop at 3rd ISWC (2004)
30. P. Traverso, M. Pistore, Automated composition of semantic web services into executable processes, in: Proceedings of the ISWC'04, 2004.
31. Zhou J., Ma L., Liu Q., Zhang L., Yu Y., and Pan Y. Minerva: a scalable OWL ontology storage and inference system. Proceedings of the 1st Asian Semantic Web Symposium (2004)