Using dependency model to support software architecture evolution

Aramis 2008 - 1st International Workshop on Automated engineeRing of Autonomous and runtiMe evolvIng Systems, and ASE2008 the 23rd IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Automated Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 82-91

  Breivold, Hongyu Pei ^a   Crnkovic, Ivica ^b   Land, Rikard ^b   Larsson, Stig ^a  

^a ABB CORPORATE RESEARCH   (Sweden)

^b MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

ANALYSIS RESULTS; ARCHITECTURAL LEVELS; CASE STUDIES; CONTROL AND PROTECTION SYSTEMS; DEPENDENCY ANALYSES; DEPENDENCY MODELS; DESIGNING SOFTWARES; DEVELOPMENT COSTS; EVOLVABILITY; INDUSTRIAL POWERS; LIFE-CYCLE; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE EVOLUTIONS; SOFTWARE COMPLEXITIES; SOFTWARE STRUCTURES; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 58049190615     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASEW.2008.4686324     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B.: Design Rules, vol 1, The Power of Modularity, MIT Press. (2000)
2. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley. (2003)
3. Bennett, K., Rajlich, V.: Software Maintenance and Evolution: a Roadmap. The Future of Software Engineering, Anthony Finkelstein (Ed.), ACM Press. (2000)
4. Boehm, B. W. et al.: Characteristics of Software Quality. Amsterdam, North-Holland. (1978)
5. Brooks, F. P. No Silver Bullet. IEEE Computer, Vol. 20, No. 4. (1987)
6. Browning, T. R.: Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. (2001)
7. Buschmann, F. et al.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns. Chichester, NY: Wiley. (1996)
8. Cai, Y., Huynh, S.: An Evolution Model for Software Modularity Assessment. Fifth International Workshop on Software Quality. (2007)
9. Chapin, N. et al.: Types of Software Evolution and Software Maintenance, Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice. (2001)
10. Clements, P., Bachmann, F., Bass, L. et al.: Documenting Software Architectures - Views and Beyond. (2007)
11. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley. (2002)
12. Developing Architecture Views. http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/ togaf8-doc/arch/chap31.html. (visited 2008)
13. Dromey, G.: Cornering the Chimera. IEEE Software (January): 33-43. (1996)
14. Feng, T., Zhang, J., Li, W.: Applying Change Impact Analysis and Design Metrics in CBR Based Software Design Improvement, Proc. of ISCIT. (2005)
15. Fitzpatrick, R. et al.: Software Quality Challenges. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. (2004)
16. Grady, R., Caswell, D.: Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, PrenticeHall. (1987)
17. Guo, G. Y., Atlee, J. M., Kazman, R.: A Software Architecture Reconstruction Method. WICSA. (1999)
18. Huynh, S., Cai, Y.: An Evolutionary Approach to Software Modularity Analysis, 1st International Workshop on Assessment of Contemporary Modularization Techniques. (2007)
19. Huynh, S., Cai, Y. et al.: Automatic Modularity Conformance Checking. ICSE (2008)
20. Improve modularity with aspect-oriented programming. http://www.ibm.com/ developerworks/java/library/j-aspectj/. (visited 2008)
21. ISO/IEC 9126-1. International Standard. Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model. (2001)
22. LaMantia, M. J., Cai, Y. et al.: Analyzing the Evolution of Large-Scale Software Systems using Design Structure Matrices and Design Rule Theory: Two Exploratory Cases. WICSA. (2008)
23. Lehman, M.: Laws of Software Evolution Revisited. Software Process Technology, 5th European Workshop EWSPT. (1996)
24. Li, L.: Change Impact Analysis for Object-Oriented Software, PhD thesis, George Mason University, Virginia, USA. (1998)
25. Lopes, C. V., Bajracharya, S. K.: An Analysis of Modularity in Aspect Oriented Design, Proc. of AOSD. (2005)
26. Lüer, C. et al.: The Evolution of Software Evolvability. IWPSE. (2001)
27. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin. C. Y.: The Impact of Component Modularity on Design Evolution: Evidence from the Software Industry. HSB Working Knowledge. (2008)
28. M artin,R.: Acyclic Dependency Principle - Granularity.http://www. objectmentor.com/resources/articles/granularity.pdf (visited 2008)
29. McCall, J. A., Richards, P. K., Walters, G. F.: Factors in Software Quality. National Technical Information Service. (1977)
30. Mens, T., Demeyer, S.: Software Evolution. Springer. (2008)
31. Padayachee, A., Eloff, J.H.P.: The Next Challenge: Aspect-oriented Programming. Proc. of the Sixth IASTED International Conference on Modelling, Simulation, and Optimization. (2006)
32. Parnas, D. L.: On the Criteria to be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules. (1972)
33. Parnas, D. L.: Designing Software for Ease of Extension and Contraction, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. (1979)
34. Pei Breivold, H., Crnkovic, I., Eriksson, P.: Analyzing Software Evolvability. Proc. of COMPSAC. (2008)
35. Rowe, D., Leaney, J.: Defining Systems Evolvability - a Taxonomy of Change. Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Computer Based Systems. (1998)
36. Sangal, N.: Expressing Software Architecture with Intermodule Dependencies. EclipseZone. http://www.eclipsezone.com/articles/lattix-dsm/. (visited 2008)
37. Sangal, N., Jordan, E., Sinha, V., Jackson, D.: Using Dependency Models to Manage Complex Software Architecture, OOPSLA. (2005)
38. Sarkar, S., Rama,: A Method for Detecting and Measuring Architectural Layering Violations in Source Code. (2006)
39. Simon, Herbert A.: The Architecture of Complexity. Proc. of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467-482, repinted in idem. (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 193-229. (1962)
40. Stoermer, C., O'Brien, L., Verhoef, C.: Moving Towards Quality Attribute Driven Software Architecture Reconstruction, Proc. of the 10th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering. (2003)
41. Sullivan, K., Cai, Y., Hallen, B., Griswold, W. G.: The Structure and Value of Modularity in Software Design, SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. (2001)