Design science, engineering science and requirements engineering

Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 310-313

  Wieringa, Roel ^a   Heerkens, Hans ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING;

COMPUTING SCIENCES; CONCURRENT ACTIVITIES; DESIGN SCIENCES; EMPIRICAL RESEARCHES; ENGINEERING SCIENCES; HISTORY OF SCIENCES; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES; RESEARCH RESULTS; SCIENTIFIC METHODS; SIMPLE MODELS;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 58049183255     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RE.2008.63     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. V. Basili and D. Weiss. A methodology for collecting valid software engineering data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-10(6):728-738, November 1984.
2. R. Baskerville. Distinguishing action research from participative case studies. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 1(1):25-45, March 1997.
3. I. Benbasat, D. Goldstein, and M. Mead. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3):369-386, September 1987.
4. I. Benbasat and R. Zmud. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1):3-16, March 1999.
5. Böhme, V. D. Daele, and W. Krohn. The 'scientification' of technology. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 219-250. Reidel, 1978.
6. M. Bunge. Technology as applied science. In F. Rapp, editor, Contributions to the Philosophy of Technology, pages 19-39. Reidel, 1974.
7. V. Bush. Science, the endless frontier. Technical report, Office of Scientific Research and Development, 1945. http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/ vbush1945.htm.
8. J. Calvert. What's so special about basic research? Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(2):199-220, March 2006.
9. A. Davis and A. Hickey. A new paradigm for planning and evaluating requirements engineering research. In 2nd International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineeering, pages 7-16, 2004.
10. K. Eisenhardt. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4):532-550, October 1989.
11. N. Fenton, S. Pfleeger, and R. Glass. Science and substance: A challenge to software engineers. IEEE Software, 11(4):86-95, July 1994.
12. R. Feynman. Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman! Vintage, 1992.
13. R. Galliers. Choosing information system research approaches. In R. Galliers, editor, Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, pages 144-166. Blackwell, 1992.
14. M. Gibbons and C. Johnson. Science, technology and the development of the transistor. In B. Barnes and D. Edge, editors, Science in Context. Readings in the Sociology of Science, pages 177-185. Open University Press, 1982.
15. R. Glass, V. Ramesh, and I. Vessey. An analysis of research in the computing disciplines. Communications of the ACM, 47(6):89-94, June 2004.
16. B. Godin. The linear model of innovation: The historical reconstruction of an analytic framework. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(6):639-667, November 2006.
17. A. Hevner, S. March, P. J, and S. Ram. Design science in information system research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1):75-105, March 2004.
18. A. Keller. Has science created technology? Minerva, 22(2):160-182, June 1984.
19. B. Kitchenham, S. Pfleeger, D. Hoaglin, K. Emam, and J. Rosenberg. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(8):721-733, August 2002.
20. B. Kitchenham, L. Pickard, and S. Pfleeger. Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software, 12(4):52-62, July 1995.
21. R. Kline. Construing "technology" as "applied science": Public rethoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis, 86(2):194-221, 1995.
22. S. Kline. Innovation is not a linear process. Research Management, 24(4):36-45, July/August 1985.
23. G. Küppers. On the relation between technology and science - goals of knowledge and dynamics of theories. The example of combustion technology, thermodynamics and fluid dynamics. In W. Krohn, E. Layton, and P. Weingart, editors, The Dynamics of Science and Technology. Sociology of the Sciences, II, pages 113-133. Reidel, 1978.
24. F. Lau. A review on the use of action research in information systems studies. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J. DeGross, editors, Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pages 31-68. Chapman & Hall, 1997.
25. E. Layton. Mirror-image twins: The communities of science and technology in 19th century America. Technology and Culture, 12(4):562-580, October 1971.
26. A. Lee. A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13(1):33-50, March 1989.
27. A. March and G. Smith. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4):251-266, December 1995.
28. B. Marsden. Watt's Perfect Engine. Steam and the Age of Invention. Icon Books, 2002.
29. F. McFarlan, editor. The Information Systems Research Challenge. Harvard Business School Press, 1984.
30. J. McKelvey. Science and technology: The driven and the driver. Technology Review, pages 38-47, January 1985.
31. N. McKendrick. The role of science in the industrial revolution: A study of Josiah Wedgwood as a scientist and industrial chemist. In M. Teich and R. Young, editors, Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, pages 274-319. Heinemann, 1973.
32. E. Mumford, R. Hirschheim, and A. Wood-Harper, editors. Research Methods in Information Systems. Elsevier North-Holland, 1985.
33. J. Nunamaker, M. Chen, and T. Purdin. Systems development in information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3):89-106, Winter 1990-1991.
34. S. Pfleeger. Experimental design and analysis in software engineering. Annals of Software Engineering, 1(1):219-253, 1995.
35. S. Pfleeger. Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 47(2-3):111-124, July 1999.
36. S. Redwine and W. Riddle. Software technology maturation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 85), pages 189-199. IEEE Computer Science Press, 1985.
37. D. Schön. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Arena, 1983.
38. M. Shaw. Prospects for an engineering discipline of software. IEEE Software, 7(2):15-24, November 1990.
39. H. Simon. The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, 1981. Second edition.
40. D. Sjøberg, J. Hannay, O. Hansen, V. Kampenes, A. Karahasanović, N.-K. L¿iborg, and A. Rekdal. A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(9):733-753, September 2005.
41. D. Stokes. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
42. W. Tichy. Should computer scientists experiment more? Computer, 31(5):32-40, May 1998.
43. R. Weber. The problem of the problem. MIS Quarterly, 27(1):iii-ix, March 2003.
44. R. Westfall. The construction of modern science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 1977, 2005. First printing Wiley, 1971.
45. R. Wieringa and J. Heerkens. The methodological soundness of requirements engineering papers: A conceptual framework and two case studies. Requirements Engineering Journal, 11(4):295-307, 2006.
46. G. Wise. Science and technology. Osiris (2nd Series), 1:229-246, 1985.
47. M. Zelkowitz and D. Wallace. Experimental validation in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 39:735-743, 1997.