Improving multi-objective genetic algorithms with adaptive design of experiments and online metamodeling

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 447-461

  Li, G ^a   Li, M ^a   Azarm, S ^a   Al Hashimi, S ^b   Al Ameri, T ^b   Al Qasas, N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Adaptive DOE; Kriging; Metamodeling; Multi objective genetic algorithm

Indexed keywords

DENSITY (OPTICAL); DESIGN; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; DIESEL ENGINES; DIFFRACTIVE OPTICAL ELEMENTS; FUNCTIONS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

ADAPTIVE DOE; DESIGN POINTS; DESIGN SPACES; DOE METHODS; ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; FUNCTION CALLS; KRIGING; METAMODELING; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; NEW APPROACHES; ONE WAYS; SIMILAR SOLUTIONS;

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS;

EID: 58049175154     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-008-0251-6     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. K Abboud M Schoenauer 2002 Surrogate deterministic mutation: preliminary results Lect Notes Comput Sci 2310 919 954 doi:10.1007/s3-540-46033-0-9
2. Anderson KS, Hsu Y (1999) Genetic crossover strategy using an approximation concept. Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE, Washington DC, pp 527-533
3. J-FM Barthelemy RT Haftka 1993 Approximation concepts for optimum structural design-a review Struct Multidisc Optim 5 129 144
4. Chung H-S, Alonso JA (2004) Multiobjective optimization using approximation model-based genetic algorithms. Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, AIAA paper 2004-4325, Albany, New York
5. Currin C, Mitchell M, Morris M, Ylvisaker D (1988) A Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of computer experiments. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL-6498
6. C Currin M Mitchell M Morris D Ylvisaker 1991 Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments J Am Stat Assoc 86 953 963
7. Deb K (2001) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York
8. D den Hertog JPC Kleijnen AYD Siem 2006 The correct kriging variance estimated by bootstrapping J Oper Res Soc 57 400 409
9. Douglas JM (1988) Conceptual design of chemical processes. McGraw-Hill Chemical Engineering Series, New York
10. M Farina 2001 A minimal cost hybrid strategy for Pareto front approximation Evolutionary Optimization 3 41 52
11. Harrison PN, Le Riche R, Haftka RT (1995) Design of stiffened composite panels by genetic algorithm and response surface approximations. Proceedings of 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, AIAA Paper 95-1163, Part 1, 10-12 April. New Orleans, LA, pp 58-68
12. JC Helton FJ Davis 2003 Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems Reliab Eng Syst Saf 81 23 69
13. Jeankoplis CJ (1993) Transport processes and unit operations, 3rd edn. PTR Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
14. Y Jin 2005 A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation Soft Comput 9 3 12
15. DR Jones 2001 A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces J Glob Optim 21 345 383
16. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks. Piscataway, NJ, pp 1942-1948
17. A Kurpati S Azarm J Wu 2002 Constraint handling improvements for multi-objective genetic algorithms Struct Multidisc Optim 23 204 213
18. Li M (2007) Robust optimization and sensitivity analysis with multi-objective genetic algorithms: single- and multi-disciplinary applications. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
19. G Li S Azarm A Farhang Mehr A Diaz 2006 Approximation of multiresponse engineering simulations: a dependent metamodeling approach Struct Multidisc Optim 31 260 269
20. G Li M Li S Azarm J Rambo Y Joshi 2007 Optimizing thermal design of data center cabinets with a new multi-objective genetic algorithm Distributed and Parallel Databases 21 167 192
21. M Li G Li S Azarm 2008 A kriging metamodel assisted multi-objective genetic algorithm for design optimization J Mech Des 130 031401 doi:10.1115/s1.2829879
22. DV Lindley 1956 On a measure of the information provided by an experiment Ann Math Stat 27 986 1005
23. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J (2002) DACE: a matlab kriging toolbox version 2.0. Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen
24. Nain P, Deb K (2002) A computationally effective multiobjective search and optimization technique using coarse-to-fine grain modeling. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, Kangal Report, 2002005
25. Nain P, Deb K (2003) Computationally effective search and optimization procedure using coarse to fine approximations. Proceedings of the congress on evolutionary computation (CEC-2003). Canberra, Australia, pp 2081-2088
26. Oduguwa V, Roy R (2002) Multiobjective optimization of rolling rod product design using metamodeling approach. Proceedings of the genetic evolutionary computation conference. New York City, NY, pp 1164-1171
27. Rasheed K (2000) Informed operators: speeding up genetic-algorithm-based design optimization using reduced models. Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference. Las Vegas, NV, pp 628-635
28. K Rasheed X Ni S Vattam 2005 Comparison of methods for developing dynamic reduced models for design optimization Soft Comput 9 29 37
29. WJ Roux N Stander RT Haftka 1998 Response surface approximations for structural optimization Int J Numer Methods Eng 42 517 534
30. S Ruzika MM Wiecek 2003 A survey of approximation methods in multiobjective programming J Optim Theory Appl 126 473 501
31. J Sacks WJ Welch TJ Mitchell HP Wynn 1989 Design and analysis of computer experiment Stat Sci 4 409 435
32. Seader JD, Henley EJ (2006) Separation process principles, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
33. S Shan GG Wang 2005 An efficient Pareto set identification approach for multiobjective optimization on black-box functions J Mech Des 127 866 874
34. MC Shewry HP Wynn 1987 Maximum entropy sampling J Appl Stat 14 165 170
35. TW Simpson AJ Booker D Ghosh AA Giunta PN Koch R-J Yang 2004 Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion Struct Multidisc Optim 27 302 313
36. US Army Corps of Engineers Internet Publishing Group (1997) Engineering and design-practical aspects of applying geostatistics at hazardous, toxic, and radioactive waste sites. Technical Letter, ETL, 1110-1-175
37. B Wilson D Cappelleri M Frecker TW Simpson 2001 Efficient Pareto frontier exploration using surrogate approximations Optimization and Engineering 2 31 50
38. J Wu S Azarm 2001 Metrics for quality assessment of a multiobjective design optimization solution set J Mech Des 123 18 25 doi:10.1115/1.1329875