Cultural differences in the perception of a social-constructivist e-learning environment: Original Articles

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 164-168

  Zhu, Chang ^a   Valcke, Martin ^a   Schellens, Tammy ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; TURBULENT FLOW;

BEIJING; CHINESE STUDENTS; CRITICAL THINKINGS; CULTURAL DIFFERENCES; E - LEARNINGS; FLANDERS; HELP GIVING; INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCES; LEARNING STRATEGIES; PEER INTERACTIONS; PEER LEARNINGS; POSITIVE ATTITUDES; STUDENT MOTIVATIONS; UNIVERSITY COURSES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 58049159816     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00879.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Chang, T-T. Lim, J. (2002). Cross-cultural communication and social presence in asynchronous learning processes. e-Service Journal, 1, 3, 83 105 (23).
2. Duffy, T. M. Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170 198). New York : Macmillan.
3. Jin, L. Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739 761.
4. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T. McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801 813.
5. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th Ed.). New York : Free Press.
6. Stone, C. Goodyear, P. (1995) Constructivism and instructional design: epistemology and the construction of meaning. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://domino.lancs.ac.uk/edres/csaltdocs.nsf
7. Zhu, C., Valcke, M. Schellens, T. (2008). A cross-cultural study of Chinese and Flemish university students: do they differ in learning conceptions and approaches to learning? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 120 127.