Technology education students: E-tutors for school children

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 32-41

  Johnson, Genevieve Marie ^a   Bratt, Sharon E ^a  

^a MACEWAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; STUDENTS;

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS; INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES; LEARNING SUPPORTS; ONLINE ACTIVITIES; TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONS; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; VIDEO CONFERENCES;

TEACHING;

EID: 58049150087     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00805.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brother Brother Big Sister of Canada (2004). Digital heroes. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://wt.bbbsc.ca/workingtogetherwebsite/wwwEnglish/ appendix/appendixA.pdf
2. Bullock, K. Wikeley, F. (2004). Whose learning? The role of the personal tutor. New York : Open University Press.
3. Cavanaugh, C. S., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M. Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: a meta-analysis. Naperville, IL : Learning Point Associates.
4. Chatta, M. K. (2006). E-tutoring. the new buzzword. Press release - stepsedu.com. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from at http://www.stepsedu.com/etutoring/ pressrelease.php?id=1
5. Corporation for National and Community Service (2005). College students helping America. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://www.learnandserve.gov/pdf/06-1016-RPD-college-full.pdf
6. Denard, H. (2003). E-tutoring and the transformations in online learning. Interactions, 7, 2. Available online http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/cap/ resources/pubs/interactions/archive/issue20/denard
7. Flowers, A. T. (2007). NCLB spurs growth in online tutoring options. School Reform News, January 1. The Heartland Institute, Chicago, IL. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=20426.
8. Gewektz, C. (2005). Tutoring efforts move forward down under. Education Week, 24, 41, 14.
9. Gordon, E. E., Morgan, R. R., O'Malley, C. J. Ponticell, J. (2007). The tutoring revolution: applying research for best practices, policy implications, and student achievement. Lanham, MD : Rowman and Littlefield.
10. Johnson, G. M. (2007). Restricted versus unrestricted learning: synthesis of recent meta-analyses. AACE Journal, 15, 267 278.
11. Johnson, G. M. Johnson, J. A. (2006). Computer technology and human learning: review of recent quantitative syntheses. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 4, 287 301.
12. Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: what controlled evaluation studies say? SRI project Number P10446.001. Arlington, VA : SRI International.
13. Stickler, C. (2004). One response to special needs in the classroom: utilizing college students as an untapped resource. New horizons for learning. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://www.newhorizons.org/lifelong/higher-ed/ stickler.htm
14. U.S. Department of Education (2007). Public Law 107-110, The No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb
15. Zenanko, M. Glover Burrows, C. (2006). The teaching/learning center and technology. Journal of the Association for the Tutoring Profession, 1. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from http://atp.jsu.edu/Synergy-1/Syn-4.pdf
16. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: a literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21, 7 27.