Boosting methods for protein fold recognition: An empirical comparison

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 393-396

  Krishnaraj, Yazhene ^a   Reddy, Chandan K ^a  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROTEIN FOLDING; STATISTICAL TESTS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ADABOOST; ART RESEARCHES; BOOSTING ALGORITHMS; BOOSTING METHODS; CLASSIFICATION MODELS; EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; FOLD RECOGNITIONS; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; NEAREST NEIGHBORS; NN ALGORITHMS; PREDICTION ACCURACIES; PROTEIN FOLD RECOGNITIONS; SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES; TERTIARY STRUCTURES;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 58049140910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/BIBM.2008.83     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. P. Baldi, S. Brunak, Y. Chauvin, C. Anderson, and H. Nielsen. Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification:an overview. Bioinformatics, 16(5):412-424, 2000.
2. C. Ding and I. Dubchak. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics, 17(4):349-358, 2001.
3. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting. Annals of Statistics, 28(2):337-407, 2000.
4. C. Hadley and D. Jones. A systematic comparison of protein structure classifications: Scop, cath and fssp. Biological Science, 7(9):1099-1112, 1999.
5. C. Huang, C. Lin, and N. Pal. Hierarchical learning architecture with automatic fearture selection for multiclass protein fold classification. IEEE transactions on NanoBioscience, 2(4):221-232, 2003.
6. D. Jones. Genthreader: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. Molecular Biology, 287(4):797-815, 1999.
7. K. Karplus, C. Barrett, and R. Hughey. Hidden markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics, 14(10):846-856, 1998.
8. R. Langlois, A. Diec, O. Perisic, Y. Dai, and H. Lu. Improved protein fold assignment using support vector machines. Int. J. Bioinformatics Research and Applications, 1(3):319-334, 2006.
9. C. Lin and C. Hsu. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 13(2):415-425, 2002.
10. O. Okun. Protein fold recognition with k-local hyperplane distance nearest neighbor algorithm. Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Data Mining and Text Mining for Bioinformatics, pages 47-53, 2004.
11. B. Rost and C. Sander. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better 70% accuracy. Journal of Molecular Biology, 232(2):584-599, 1993.
12. V. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York, 1995.
13. P. Vincent and Y. Bengio. K-local hyperplane and convex distance nearest neighbor algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14:985-992, 2002.
14. I. H. Witten and E. Frank. Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, 2005.