When chronic isn't chronic: The moderating role of active self-aspects

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-15

  Brown, Christina M ^a   McConnell, Allen R ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronicity; Construct accessibility; Self aspects; Self concept; Social perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARACTER; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT;

CHARACTER; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 58049140563     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167208324675     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allport, G.W. (1955). Becoming. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Bargh, J.A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 425-436.
3. Bargh, J.A., Bond, R.N., Lombardi, W.J., & Tota, M.E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878.
4. Bargh, J.A., Lombardi, W.J., & Higgins, E.T. (1988). Automaticity of chronically accessible constructs in Person × Situation effects on person perception: It's just a matter of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 599-605.
5. Baumeister, R.F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T., Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4 th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Bodenhausen, G.V., & Macrae, C.N. (1998). Stereotype activation and inhibition. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Stereotype activation and inhibition: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11, pp. 1-52). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Brewer, M.B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
8. Bruner, J.S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
9. Dovidio, J.F., Gaertner, S.L., & Validzic, A. (1998). Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 109-120.
10. Dunning, D. (2003). The relation of self to social perception. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 421-441). New York: Guilford.
11. Förster, J., & Liberman, N. (2007). Contrast effects in knowledge activation: The case of inhibition effects due to competing constructs or goal fulfillment. In D. A. Stapel & J. Suls (Eds.), Assimilation and contrast in social psychology (pp. 269-287). New York: Psychology Press.
12. Higgins, E.T. (1989). Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 75-123). New York: Guilford.
13. Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
14. Higgins, E.T., King, G.A., & Mavin, G.H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
15. Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., & Jones, C.R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
16. Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2004). Category membership moderates the inhibition of social identities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 233-238.
17. Kelley, H.H. (1972). Attribution in social interaction, In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
18. Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1, 2). New York: Norton.
19. Linville, P.W. (1985). Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. Social Cognition, 3, 94-120.
20. Linville, P.W., & Carlston, D.E. (1994). Social cognition perspective on self. In P. G. Devine, D. L. Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Contributions to classic issues in social psychology (pp. 143-193). New York / Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
21. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
22. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
23. Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R.L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494-1512.
24. Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
25. McConnell, A.R. (2007). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. McConnell, A.R., Renaud, J.M., Dean, K.K., Green, S.P., Lamoreaux, M.J., Hall, C.E., et al. (2005). Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 1-18.
27. McConnell, A.R., Rydell, R.J., & Brown, C.M. (2008). On the experience of self-relevant feedback: How self-concept organization influences affective responses and self-evaluations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. McConnell, A.R., & Strain, L.M. (2007). Content and structure of the self. In C. Sedikides & S. Spencer (Eds.), The self in social psychology (pp. 51-73). New York: Psychology Press.
29. Mischel, W., & Morf, C.C. (2003). The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 15-43). New York: Guilford.
30. Renaud, J.M., & McConnell, A.R. (2002). Organization of the self-concept and the suppression of self-relevant thoughts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 79-86.
31. Roberts, B.W., & Donahue, E.M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199-218.
32. Schleicher, D.J., & McConnell, A.R. (2005). The complexity of self-complexity: An associated systems theory approach. Social Cognition, 23, 387-416.
33. Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J.J. (1993). The self in impression formation: Trait centrality and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 347-357.
34. Shah, J., & Higgins, E.T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 693-705.
35. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T.L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.
36. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T.L., & Trahan, A. (2006). Domain-specific effects of stereotypes on performance. Self and Identity, 5, 1-14.
37. Showers, C. (1992). Compartmentalization of positive and negative self-knowledge: Keeping bad apples out of the bunch. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1036-1049.
38. Smith, E.R. (2002). Overlapping mental representations of self and group: Evidence and implications. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 21-35). New York: Psychology Press.
39. Srull, T.K., & Wyer, S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
40. Steele, C.M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. Triandis, H.C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.