Can there be true partnership between clinicians and the Home Office?

Advances in Psychiatric Treatment

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 459-461

  Eastman, Nigel ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049131251     PISSN: 13555146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/apt.12.6.459     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Coid, J. & Maden, T. (2003) Should psychiatrists protect the public? BMJ, 326, 406-407.
2. Department of Health (2006) Next Steps for the Mental Health Bill. Press Announcement, 23 March, no. 2006/0108. London: Department of Health.
3. Eastman, N. L. G. (1999) Public health psychiatry or crime prevention? BMJ, 318, 549-551.
4. Eastman, N. (2006) Mental health law reform in England and Wales. BMJ, 332, 737-738.
5. Roberts, C., Peay, J. & Eastman, N. (2002) Mental health professionals' attitudes towards legal compulsion: report of a national survey. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 71-82.
6. Shooter, M. & Cox, J. (1999) Royal College of Psychiatrists' Response to 'Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder: Proposals for Policy Development'. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
7. Srinivas, J., Denvir, S. & Humphreys, M. (2006) The Home Office Mental Health Unit. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, 450-485.
8. W. v. Egdell [1990] 1 All ER 835.