Ontology evaluation using wikipedia categories for browsing

International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 223-232

  Yu, Jonathan ^a   Thom, James A ^a   Tam, Audrey ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Browsing; Ontology evaluation; User studies; Wikipedia

Indexed keywords

BROWSING; EVALUATION METHODS; USER STUDIES; WIKIPEDIA;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 58049111201     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1321440.1321474     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Info. Retrieval. ACM Press / Addison-Wesley, 1999.
2. C. Brewster, H. Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, and Y. Wilks. Data driven ontology evaluation. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Lang. Resources and Eval., Lisbon, Portugal, 2004. European Lang. Resources Assoc.
3. J. S. Dong, C. H. Lee, H. B. Lee, Y. F. Li, and H. Wang. A combined approach to checking web ontologies. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on World Wide Web, pages 714-722. ACM Press, 2004.
4. A. Gangemi, C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita, and J. Lehmann. Ontology evaluation and validation. Technical report, Lab. for Applied Ontology, 2005.
5. A. Gómez-Pérez. Towards a framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems With Applications, 11(4):519-529, 1996.
6. A. Gómez-Pérez. Evaluation of ontologies. Intl. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16:391-409, 2001.
7. T. R. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2):199-220, 1993.
8. T. R. Gruber. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Intl. Journal Human-Computer Studies, 43(5-6):907-928, 1995.
9. M. Grüninger and M. Fox. Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, IJCAI'95, 1995.
10. N. Guarino. Some ontological principles for designing upper level lexical resources. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Conf. on Lexical Resources and Evaluation, May 1998.
11. N. Guarino and C. Welty. Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean. C.ACM, 45(2):61-65, 2002.
12. A. Maedche and S. Staab. Measuring similarity between ontologies. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Eng. and Knowledge Management, 2002.
13. G. Marchionini. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
14. D. L. McGuinness. Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential, chapter 6: Ontologies Come of Age, pages 171-195. MIT Press, 2002.
15. S. Tartir, I. Arpinar, M. Moore, A. Sheth, and B. Aleman-Meza. OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis. In Autonomous, Semantically Heterogeneous Data and Knowledge Sources, 2005.
16. R. Thompson and W. Croft. Support for browsing in an intelligent text retrieval system. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 30(6):639-668, 1989.
17. M. Uschold and M. Grüninger. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2):93-155, 1996.
18. J. Yu, J. A. Thom, and A. Tam. Evaluating ontology criteria for requirements in a geographic travel domain. In Proc. of Intl. Conf. on Ontologies, DataBases and Applications of Semantics, 2005.
19. Y. Zhao and G. Karypis. Hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(2):141-168, 2005.