Density matrix numerical renormalization group for non-Abelian symmetries

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 78, Issue 24, 2008, Pages

  Toth A I ^a,b   Moca, C P ^a,c   Legeza, A ^a,d   Zarand G ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA   (Romania)

^d WIGNER RESEARCH CENTRE FOR PHYSICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 58049104592     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.245109     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. For a review, see, e.g., L. I. Glazman and M. Pustilnik, in Nanophysics: Coherence and Transport, edited by, H. Bouchiat, S. Guéron, Y. Gefen, G. Montambaux and, J. Dalibard, (Elsevier, New York, 2005), pp. 427-478.
2. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996). 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
3. N. Andrei and C. Destri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 364 (1984). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.364
4. A. M. Tsvelick and P. B. Wiegmann, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 125 (1985). 10.1007/BF01017853
5. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Nucl. Phys. B 352, 849 (1991) 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90109-B
6. I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 641 (1991) 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90419-X
7. I. Affleck, A. W. W. Ludwig, H. B. Pang, and D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. B 45, 7918 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.7918
8. V. J. Emery and S. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10812 (1992). 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.10812
9. A. A. Abrikosov, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 2, 5 (1965).
10. M. Fowler and A. Zawadowski, Solid State Commun. 9, 471 (1971). 10.1016/0038-1098(71)90324-3
11. Ph. Nozières, J. Low Temp. Phys. 17, 31 (1974). 10.1007/BF00654541
12. K. G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975) 10.1103/RevModPhys.47.773
13. for a recent review of NRG, see R. Bulla, T. Costi, and T. Pruschke, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 395 (2008). 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.395
14. L. N. Oliveira and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 24, 4863 (1981) 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.4863
15. L. N. Oliveira and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 32, 696 (1985). 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.696
16. T. A. Costi and A. C. Hewson, Philos. Mag. B 65, 1165 (1992). 10.1080/13642819208215080
17. T. A. Costi, A. C. Hewson, and V. Zlatić, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 2519 (1994). 10.1088/0953-8984/6/13/013
18. S. Suzuki, O. Sakai, and Y. Shimizu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 4034 (1996). 10.1143/JPSJ.65.4034
19. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992) 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863
20. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345
21. W. Hofstetter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1508 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85. 1508
22. F. B. Anders and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 196801 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.196801
23. R. Peters, T. Pruschke, and F. B. Anders, Phys. Rev. B 74, 245114 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245114
24. A. Weichselbaum and J. von Delft, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 076402 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.076402
25. R. Žitko and J. Bonca, Phys. Rev. B 73, 035332 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.035332
26. I. P. McCulloch and M. Gulácsi, Europhys. Lett. 57, 852 (2002). 10.1209/epl/i2002-00393-0
27. U. Schollwöck, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259 (2005). 10.1103/RevModPhys. 77.259
28. This code has open access and is accessible at the site http://www.phy.bme.hu/~dmnrg
29. for a comprehensive manual, see O. Legeza, C. P. Moca, A. I. Toth, I. Weymann, and G. Zarand, arXiv:0809.3143 (unpublished).
30. D. L. Cox and A. Zawadowski, Adv. Phys. 47, 599 (1998). 10.1080/000187398243500
31. R. M. Potok, I. G. Rau, H. Shtrikman, Y. Oreg, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Nature (London) 446, 167 (2007). 10.1038/nature05556
32. For groups like SU(3), having a more complicated Cartan subalgebra, every component of the internal labels Qi,z is composed of several quantum numbers.
33. One could also use a convention where the states of a given quantum number are distinguished by separate labels.
34. J. F. Cornwell, Group Theory in Physics, An Introduction (Academic, New York, 1997).
35. Some of the considerations presented here do not carry over for noncompact Lie groups.
36. Approximations also exist in the literature, e.g., the one in Ref. where comes only from the last iteration.
37. A. I. Tóth, L. Borda, J. von Delft, and G. Zaránd, Phys. Rev. B 76, 155318 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.155318
38. One can show that ρ f0, α, = 1 2 ρ0 = 1 4 at the 2CK fixed point, in the large bandwidth limit. This follows from a theorem of Maldacena and Ludwig who proved that the single-particle S matrix vanishes at the 2CK fixed point, and from the relation between the Green's function of the local fermion f0,α, and the T matrix; see, e.g., Eq. (30) of Ref..
39. A. I. Tóth and G. Zaránd, Phys. Rev. B 78, 165130 (2008). 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.165130
40. T. A. Costi, Phys. Rev. B 64, 241310 (R) (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.64. 241310
41. B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 125 (1988). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.125
42. The eigenvalues of the operators S 2 and C 2 are given by S (S+1), C (C+1).
43. A. I. Tóth, Ph.D. thesis, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 2009.